These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9012571)

  • 1. EMBASE remains EMBASE--on every host? A comparative analysis of EMBASE on the hosts DATA-STAR, DIALOG, DIMDI, and STN.
    Gretz M; Schmitt RD; Thomas M
    Comput Biomed Res; 1996 Dec; 29(6):494-506. PubMed ID: 9012571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is a search not a search? A comparison of searching the AMED complementary health database via EBSCOhost, OVID and DIALOG.
    Younger P; Boddy K
    Health Info Libr J; 2009 Jun; 26(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 19490151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting comfortable with STN: search tips.
    Prasek MA
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1997; 16(2):37-48. PubMed ID: 10173590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound and relevant causation studies in EMBASE.
    Haynes RB; Kastner M; Wilczynski NL;
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2005 Mar; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15784134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators.
    Murphy LS; Reinsch S; Najm WI; Dickerson VM; Seffinger MA; Adams A; Mishra SI
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2003 Jul; 3():3. PubMed ID: 12846931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The application of quality filters in searching the clinical literature: some possible heuristics.
    Johnson ED; McKinin EJ; Sievert M
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1992; 11(4):39-59. PubMed ID: 10171372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches.
    Woods D; Trewheellar K
    BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1166. PubMed ID: 9552968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies.
    Ruiz-Pérez R; Delgado López-Cózar E; Jiménez-Contreras E
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2002 Oct; 90(4):411-30. PubMed ID: 12398248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimized retrieval of primary care clinical prediction rules from MEDLINE to establish a Web-based register.
    Keogh C; Wallace E; O'Brien KK; Murphy PJ; Teljeur C; McGrath B; Smith SM; Doherty N; Dimitrov BD; Fahey T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):848-60. PubMed ID: 21411285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the evidence: the challenges of searching for research on acupuncture.
    Pilkington K; Richardson J
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Jun; 10(3):587-90. PubMed ID: 15253867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopy information online: can endoscopists close the gap between what is known and what they do?
    Krabshuis J
    Endoscopy; 1997 Nov; 29(9):871-82. PubMed ID: 9476773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE.
    McKinlay RJ; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jun; 6():67. PubMed ID: 16756662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bibliographic information retrieval in the field of artificial nutrition.
    Farriol M; Jordà-Olives M; Padró JB
    Clin Nutr; 1998 Oct; 17(5):217-22. PubMed ID: 10205345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
    Topfer LA; Parada A; Menon D; Noorani H; Perras C; Serra-Prat M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10507189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using concept relations to improve ranking in information retrieval.
    Price SL; Delcambre LM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():619-23. PubMed ID: 16779114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns?
    Stevinson C; Lawlor DA
    Complement Ther Med; 2004 Dec; 12(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15649836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact on database searching arising from inconsistency in the nomenclature of parasitic diseases.
    Kassai T
    Vet Parasitol; 2006 Jun; 138(3-4):358-61. PubMed ID: 16564630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.