These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9012724)

  • 1. The review of randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. What does the verdict mean for clinicians?
    Bryant H
    CMAJ; 1997 Jan; 156(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 9012724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The review of randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Is the debate over?
    Boyd NF
    CMAJ; 1997 Jan; 156(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 9012723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a review for evidence of subversion.
    Bailar JC; MacMahon B
    CMAJ; 1997 Jan; 156(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 9012720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of screening mammography: a review for the primary care physician.
    Reichle JL
    South Med J; 1998 Jun; 91(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 9634110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
    Temple LK; Wang EE; McLeod RS
    CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 10551200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Why? What next? And so what?
    Baines CJ
    Cancer; 1995 Nov; 76(10 Suppl):2107-12. PubMed ID: 8635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample.
    Andersen MR; Smith R; Meischke H; Bowen D; Urban N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Apr; 12(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 12692105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.
    Daly L
    Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Developmental Panel.
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):vii-xviii. PubMed ID: 9709265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening: success amid conflict.
    Leitch AM
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 8(4):657-72, vi. PubMed ID: 10452933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Screening for breast cancer on basis of individual risk assessment for women ineligible for the national population screening program].
    van Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; van der Horst F; de Koning HJ; Rutgers EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 11206121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in women under fifty: a review.
    Ewart RM
    Nebr Med J; 1992 Dec; 77(12):330-5. PubMed ID: 1480253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What influences family physicians' cancer screening decisions when practice guidelines are unclear or conflicting?
    Tudiver F; Guibert R; Haggerty J; Ciampi A; Medved W; Brown JB; Herbert C; Katz A; Ritvo P; Grant B; Goel V; Smith P; O'Beirne M; Williams JI; Moliner P
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Sep; 51(9):760. PubMed ID: 12366894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of screening mammography and its demographic and risk determinants in women 25 to 65 years of age].
    Simó Miñana J; Gaztambide Ganuza M; Morote Sanchís MV; Palazón Ferrer G; Gálvez Candel J; Salto Sánchez ML; Peñarroja González D; Hernández Aguado I
    Med Clin (Barc); 1997 May; 108(20):767-71. PubMed ID: 9265080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
    Halabi S; Skinner CS; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Crawford YS; Rimer BK
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.
    Cohen M
    Psychooncology; 2006 Oct; 15(10):873-83. PubMed ID: 16374894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geographic association between mammography use and mortality reduction in the US.
    Das B; Feuer EJ; Mariotto A
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 16049808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women.
    Miller AB; Howe GR; Wall C
    Clin Invest Med; 1981; 4(3-4):227-58. PubMed ID: 6802546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.