These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9014065)

  • 21. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
    Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
    Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Clayton total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study.
    Papenfus K; Clayton ML; Dennis DA; Stringer TL; Stringer EA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Aug; (281):133-9. PubMed ID: 1499199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
    Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions.
    Cameron HU
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):47-53. PubMed ID: 8118994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revision hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless stem: mid-term follow up.
    Jibodh SR; Schwarzkopf R; Anthony SG; Malchau H; Dempsey KE; Estok DM
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1167-72. PubMed ID: 23114191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Experience of using anterior windowing of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Li H; Lin JH
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 50(5):398-401. PubMed ID: 22883943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components.
    Engh CA; Culpepper WJ; Kassapidis E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):168-78. PubMed ID: 9520886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes of long tapered hydroxyapatite-coated stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Makani A; Kim TW; Kamath AF; Garino JP; Lee GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):827-30. PubMed ID: 24071547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Salvati EA; Pellicci PM; Wilson PD; Ranawat CS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Sep; 67(7):1074-85. PubMed ID: 4030826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revision arthroplasty with an isoelastic uncemented femoral stem.
    Niinimäki TJ; Puranen JP; Jalovaara PK
    Int Orthop; 1995; 19(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 8567138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review.
    Mulliken BD; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):156-62. PubMed ID: 8998868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Bono JV; McCarthy JC; Lee J; Carangelo RJ; Turner RH
    Instr Course Lect; 2000; 49():131-9. PubMed ID: 10829169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Modular shafts in hip prosthesis revision surgery].
    Cameron HU
    Orthopade; 2001 May; 30(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 11417236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. RM isoelastic total hip arthroplasty. A review of 34 cases.
    Jakim I; Barlin C; Sweet MB
    J Arthroplasty; 1988; 3(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 3183673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects].
    Bircher HP; Riede U; Lüem M; Ochsner PE
    Orthopade; 2001 May; 30(5):294-303. PubMed ID: 11417237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Porous pad separation and loosening of Harris-Galante femoral hip components.
    Woolson ST; Comstock CP
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 8792256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Proximal fixation of hip endoprostheses with porous surface: results of 6 years].
    Decking J; Rosendahl T; Decking D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 10408052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cemented revision for femoral failure.
    Harris WH
    Orthopedics; 1995 Sep; 18(9):854-5. PubMed ID: 8570490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.