229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9014279)
1. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
Mul T; Mongelli M; Gardosi J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 8(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9014279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan.
Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Reilly M; Valentin L; Grunewald C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 24(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of ultrasound dating formulae in the late second-trimester in pregnancies conceived with in-vitro fertilization.
Mongelli M; Yuxin NG; Biswas A; Chew S
Acta Radiol; 2003 Jul; 44(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 12846699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Third-trimester ultrasound dating algorithms derived from pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
Mongelli M; Chew S; Yuxin NG; Biswas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 16041677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age.
Wennerholm UB; Bergh C; Hagberg H; Sultan B; Wennergren M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 9793188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femur length versus biparietal diameter for estimating gestational age in the third trimester.
Egley CC; Seeds JW; Cefalo RC
Am J Perinatol; 1986 Apr; 3(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 3516170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of second trimester biometry in singleton and twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive techniques.
Gardosi J; Mul T; Francis A; Hall J; Fishel S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jun; 104(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 9197881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical implications of machine-probe combinations on obstetric ultrasound measurements used in pregnancy dating.
Axell R; Lynch C; Chudleigh T; Bradshaw L; Mangat J; White P; Lees C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22190416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new mathematical formula for predicting long bone length in early pregnancy.
Rosati P; Guariglia L; Capelli G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 19(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11876813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biparietal diameter/femur length ratio and actual femur length/expected femur length ratio: a sonographic screening method for Down's syndrome.
Sukcharoen N; Tannirandorn Y; Suwajanakorn S; Paosawadi S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Aug; 75(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 1300366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
Wessel H; Nyberg T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
Doubilet PM
Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal age assessment based on 2nd trimester ultrasound in Africa and the effect of ethnicity.
Salpou D; Kiserud T; Rasmussen S; Johnsen SL
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Oct; 8():48. PubMed ID: 18973673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conceptual dating by ultrasonic measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter in early pregnancy.
Selbing A; Kjessler B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 3909731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Second-trimester assessment of gestational age in twins: validation of singleton biometry charts.
Dias T; Arcangeli T; Bhide A; Mahsud-Dornan S; Papageorghiou A; Thilaganathan B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 20617507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
