BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9015089)

  • 1. Rapid method for rigorous assessment of radiologic imaging technologies.
    Sunshine JH; McNeil BJ
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):549-57. PubMed ID: 9015089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategy development for anticipating and handling a disruptive technology.
    Chan S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):778-86. PubMed ID: 17412168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments.
    Harker J; Kleijnen J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Dec; 10(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 23173665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technology assessment for radiologists.
    Sunshine JH; Applegate KE
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 14752174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technology assessment in medicine: methods, status and trends.
    Hendee WR
    Med Prog Technol; 1991; 17(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 1835752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging technology and practice assessments: diagnostic performance, clinical relevance, and generalizability in a changing environment.
    Gur D
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 15516611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colliding forces in radiology: technologic imperative, resource limitations, and accountability demands.
    Hendee WR; Brown EF; Stanley RJ; Thrall JH; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1994 May; 14(3):647-53; discussion 654-5. PubMed ID: 8066277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.
    Hunink MG; Krestin GP
    Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 11867773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.
    Bowen JM; Patterson LL; O'Reilly D; Hopkins RB; Blackhouse G; Burke N; Xie F; Tarride JE; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 19394573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New imaging technology and cost containment.
    Hillman BJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):503-6. PubMed ID: 8109484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches for economic evaluations of health care technologies.
    Tarride JE; Blackhouse G; Bischof M; McCarron EC; Lim M; Ferrusi IL; Xie F; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 19394571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model for technology assessment applied to pulse oximetry. The Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Apr; 21(4):615-24. PubMed ID: 8472583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint report of the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Medical Service. Technology assessment in medicine.
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1728928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical trials of cost effectiveness in technology evaluation.
    Valk PE
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10967629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1125-9. PubMed ID: 18954812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
    Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technology assessment: scientific challenges.
    Royal HD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 8079834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-trends in health technology assessments: an analysis of developments in composition of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002.
    Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 16262973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.