These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9015560)

  • 21. Observational fear conditioning in the acquisition and extinction of attentional bias for threat: an experimental evaluation.
    Kelly MM; Forsyth JP
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):324-35. PubMed ID: 17516811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expecting yoghurt drinks to taste sweet or pleasant increases liking.
    Kuenzel J; Zandstra EH; El Deredy W; Blanchette I; Thomas A
    Appetite; 2011 Feb; 56(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 21147190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex differences in response to an observational fear conditioning procedure.
    Kelly MM; Forsyth JP
    Behav Ther; 2007 Dec; 38(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 18021949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Observational learning and pain-related fear: an experimental study with colored cold pressor tasks.
    Helsen K; Goubert L; Peters ML; Vlaeyen JW
    J Pain; 2011 Dec; 12(12):1230-9. PubMed ID: 22019133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fear acquisition requires awareness in trace but not delay conditioning.
    Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 17241153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Affect, attention, or anticipatory arousal? Human blink startle modulation in forward and backward affective conditioning.
    Mallan KM; Lipp OV; Libera M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jul; 69(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 18423918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. I don't like it because it eats sprouts: conditioning preferences in children.
    Field AP
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Mar; 44(3):439-55. PubMed ID: 15885655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flavour liking and preference conditioned by caffeine in humans.
    Yeomans MR; Durlach PJ; Tinley EM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Jan; 58(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 15844377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of the mother in the development of flavored-food preference in lambs.
    Saint-Dizier H; Lévy F; Ferreira G
    Dev Psychobiol; 2007 Jan; 49(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 17186512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus.
    Kattner F
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 21557120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An expectations-based approach to explaining the cross-modal influence of color on orthonasal olfactory identification: the influence of the degree of discrepancy.
    Shankar M; Simons C; Shiv B; McClure S; Levitan CA; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1981-93. PubMed ID: 20952794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-competitive liking for brands. No blocking in evaluative conditioning.
    Laane K; Aru J; Dickinson A
    Appetite; 2010 Feb; 54(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 19788904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Failure to condition to a cue is associated with sustained contextual fear.
    Baas JM; van Ooijen L; Goudriaan A; Kenemans JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Mar; 127(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 18048004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conditioned food aversion elicited by the temperature of drinking water as a conditioned stimulus in rats.
    Sako N; Ohashi R; Sakai N; Katsukawa H; Sugimura T
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Oct; 83(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 15501495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of CS-US contingency in human evaluative conditioning.
    Baeyens F; Hermans D; Eelen P
    Behav Res Ther; 1993 Nov; 31(8):731-7. PubMed ID: 8257404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flavor evaluative conditioning and contingency awareness.
    Wardle SG; Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF
    Learn Behav; 2007 Nov; 35(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 18047221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of virtual reality for a human classical conditioning procedure.
    Gutierrez-Martinez O; Gutierrez-Maldonado J; Loreto D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 154():171-5. PubMed ID: 20543292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: implications for the extinction of evaluative learning.
    Lipp OV; Purkis HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 17044745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluative conditioning and conscious knowledge of contingencies: a correlational investigation with large samples.
    Bar-Anan Y; De Houwer J; Nosek BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2313-35. PubMed ID: 20544561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Generalization of evaluative conditioning toward foods: Increasing sensitivity to health in eating intentions.
    Bui ET; Fazio RH
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):852-855. PubMed ID: 27505206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.