These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9015815)

  • 1. Equivalent methods to analyse dynamic experiments in which the input function is noisy.
    Huesman RH
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jan; 42(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 9015815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinetic data analysis with a noisy input function.
    Huesman RH; Mazoyer BM
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Dec; 32(12):1569-79. PubMed ID: 3501592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter uncertainties: impact of criterion function form and constraints.
    Lutchen KR
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1990 Aug; 69(2):766-75. PubMed ID: 2228887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind estimation of compartmental model parameters.
    Di Bella EV; Clackdoyle R; Gullberg GT
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):765-80. PubMed ID: 10211809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to deal with the high condition number of the noise covariance matrix of gravity field functionals synthesised from a satellite-only global gravity field model?
    Klees R; Slobbe DC; Farahani HH
    J Geod; 2019; 93(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 30872904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of Autoregressive Parameters from Noisy Observations Using Iterated Covariance Updates.
    Moon TK; Gunther JH
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 May; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33286345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC; Chen S; Feng D; Wong KP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted linear least squares estimation of diffusion MRI parameters: strengths, limitations, and pitfalls.
    Veraart J; Sijbers J; Sunaert S; Leemans A; Jeurissen B
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():335-346. PubMed ID: 23684865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise analysis of MAP-EM algorithms for emission tomography.
    Wang W; Gindi G
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Nov; 42(11):2215-32. PubMed ID: 9394408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling requirements for dynamic cardiac PET studies using image-derived input functions.
    Raylman RR; Caraher JM; Hutchins GD
    J Nucl Med; 1993 Mar; 34(3):440-7. PubMed ID: 8441036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal image sampling schedule for both image-derived input and output functions in PET cardiac studies.
    Li X; Feng D; Chen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Mar; 19(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 10875707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimisation of parameter estimation errors in dynamic PET: choice of scanning schedules.
    Jovkar S; Evans AC; Diksic M; Nakai H; Yamamoto YL
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Jul; 34(7):895-908. PubMed ID: 2789408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of maximum likelihood and least-squares estimates in the lidar slope method with noisy data.
    Eberhard WL
    Appl Opt; 2017 Apr; 56(10):2667-2685. PubMed ID: 28375227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of non-uniform weighting in non-linear regression for pharmacokinetic neuroreceptor modelling.
    Thiele F; Buchert R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 18094641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of errors in parameter estimation with application to physiological systems.
    Grove TM; Bekey GA; Haywood LJ
    Am J Physiol; 1980 Nov; 239(5):R390-400. PubMed ID: 7435652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parameter Estimation for Groundwater Models under Uncertain Irrigation Data.
    Demissie Y; Valocchi A; Cai X; Brozovic N; Senay G; Gebremichael M
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):614-25. PubMed ID: 25040235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accurate local blood flow measurements with dynamic PET: fast determination of input function delay and dispersion by multilinear minimization.
    van den Hoff J; Burchert W; Müller-Schauenburg W; Meyer GJ; Hundeshagen H
    J Nucl Med; 1993 Oct; 34(10):1770-7. PubMed ID: 8410297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new double modeling approach for dynamic cardiac PET studies using noise and spillover contaminated LV measurements.
    Feng D; Li X; Huang SC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 8682545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.