These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9016148)

  • 1. Reimbursement challenges and how to meet them.
    Motta G; Hagler DD; McCooey AK
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1996 Oct; 42(9):50-6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 9016148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Documentation and reimbursement by clinical setting.
    Motta GJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1996 May; 42(4):18-20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 8826135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weaving reimbursement of surgical dressings into the plan of treatment.
    Turnbull G
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):103S-110S; discussion 111S. PubMed ID: 7669195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surviving in this new age of "health care reform" and rapidly changing policies: three viewpoints of Medicare coverage issues.
    White CL; Motta GJ; Brown-Etris M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993 Jun; 39(5):70-72, 74-8, 82. PubMed ID: 8397709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photodocumentation reverses Medicare reimbursement denial.
    Campbell CG; Sacramento L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):18-23. PubMed ID: 7598774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.
    Manchikanti L; Giordano J
    Pain Physician; 2007 Sep; 10(5):607-26. PubMed ID: 17876359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare payment system for wound care dressings.
    Schaum KD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Sep; 51(9):18. PubMed ID: 16353387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.
    Sneed RC; May WL; Stencel C
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e612-25. PubMed ID: 15520092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of the new DMERC medical policy on surgical dressings.
    Krasner D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993; 39(9):24-7, 30-2. PubMed ID: 8135999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2003 and inclusion of registered nurses in the personnel provision of the critical access hospital emergency services requirement for frontier areas and remote locations. Final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2002 Dec; 67(251):79965-80184. PubMed ID: 12510665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does a skilled nursing facility get reimbursed by Medicare? Interview by Kathleen D. Schaum.
    Hurt B
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 24(9):394-402. PubMed ID: 21860262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DMERC medical coverage policies for surgical dressings: from speculation to stark reality.
    McCooey AK; Noss E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993 Sep; 39(7):52, 54, 56, 59. PubMed ID: 8311901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medicare's policy to limit payment for hospital-acquired conditions: the impact on safety net providers.
    McHugh M; Martin TC; Orwat J; Dyke KV
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2011 May; 22(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 21551939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wound center facility billing: A retrospective analysis of time, wound size, and acuity scoring for determining facility level of service.
    Fife CE; Walker D; Farrow W; Otto G
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Jan; 53(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 17264354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in the Medicare home health care market: the impact of reimbursement policy.
    Choi S; Davitt JK
    Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19194328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Constant force technology" versus low-air-loss therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Branom R; Rappl LM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Sep; 47(9):38-46. PubMed ID: 11889743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wound dressings reclassified by the FDA.
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 11061705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.