130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9016199)
1. Communication of the significant but not urgent finding.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):329-31. PubMed ID: 9016199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Malpractice issues in radiology. American College of Radiology Standard for Communication.
Cascade PN; Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1439-42. PubMed ID: 10584778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The deep pocket.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 11044015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiology reports.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):943-6. PubMed ID: 9308440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mock trial at 2009 RSNA annual meeting: Jury exonerates radiologist for failure to communicate abnormal finding--but...
Berlin L
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):836-45. PubMed ID: 21084416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of patient registration and processing.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1483-6. PubMed ID: 9393149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are radiologists contracted by third parties to interpret radiographs liable for not communicating results directly to patients?
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11756081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Legal malpractice-related aspects of consultation].
Freyschmidt JC
Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 10094518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Professional liability insurance.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):565-9. PubMed ID: 9490932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Liability for reaction to contrast media administration.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jun; 202(6):W597. PubMed ID: 24848855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Communication of the urgent finding.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):513-5. PubMed ID: 8623618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist's duty?
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 11906852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When is it malpractice to miss lung cancer on chest radiographs?
Potchen EJ; Bisesi MA
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2179991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Vicarious liability.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):621-4. PubMed ID: 9275865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Clinical and Medicolegal Implications of Radiology Results Communication.
Aryal B; Khorsand DA; Dubinsky TJ
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(5):287-289. PubMed ID: 29122395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liability of performing CT screening for coronary artery disease and lung cancer.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):837-42. PubMed ID: 12239021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: Disclaimers on reports.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W657. PubMed ID: 24059407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liability ... review of radiology-related malpractice claims.
Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Jun; 71(12):32. PubMed ID: 9217479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: Recommending additional and follow-up radiologic examinations.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W656. PubMed ID: 24059406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicolegal: malpractice and ethical issues in radiology.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):W532. PubMed ID: 23617521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
