These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017012)

  • 1. 1996 AUR Memorial Award. Densitometric analysis of eccentric vascular stenoses: comparison of CO2 and iodinated contrast media.
    Black CM; Lang EV; Kusnick CA; Siebes M; Barnhart W; Berbaum KS; Hoffman EA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):985-93. PubMed ID: 9017012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of CO2 angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO2 versus iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model.
    Moresco KP; Patel N; Johnson MS; Trobridge D; Bergan KA; Lalka SG
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 10787201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities: carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material.
    Oliva VL; Denbow N; Thérasse E; Common AA; Harel C; Giroux MF; Soulez G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jun; 10(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 10392939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative digital fluorography. Computer vs. human estimation of vascular stenoses.
    Jaques P; DiBianca F; Pizer S; Kohout F; Lifshitz L; Delany D
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 3884545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quantification of vascular stenoses using digital subtraction angiography].
    Herter M; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 3001855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between the pixel value in digital subtraction angiography and iodine concentration: study in high iodine concentration with original phantom.
    Chida K; Sai M; Saito H; Takase K; Zuguchi M; Sasaki M; Sato T
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2000 Mar; 190(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 10778800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography using carbon dioxide by 'home made' delivery system and conventional iodinated contrast media in the evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower limbs.
    Madhusudhan KS; Sharma S; Srivastava DN; Thulkar S; Mehta SN; Prasad G; Seenu V; Agarwal S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 19453527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries.
    Schreier DZ; Weaver FA; Frankhouse J; Papanicolaou G; Shore E; Yellin AE; Harvey F
    Arch Surg; 1996 May; 131(5):503-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 8624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated carbon dioxide digital angiography for lower-limb arterial disease evaluation: safety assessment and comparison with standard iodinated contrast media angiography.
    Scalise F; Novelli E; Auguadro C; Casali V; Manfredi M; Zannoli R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 27(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 25589696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy with carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material in the imaging of hemodialysis access fistulas.
    Ehrman KO; Taber TE; Gaylord GM; Brown PB; Hage JP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(5):771-5. PubMed ID: 8000128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carbon dioxide (CO2) digital subtraction angiography: 26-year experience at the University of Florida.
    Hawkins IF; Caridi JG
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 9510571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.
    Racadio JM; Kashinkunti SR; Nachabe RA; Racadio JM; Johnson ND; Kukreja KU; Patel MN; Privitera MB; Hales JE; Abruzzo TA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1491-501. PubMed ID: 23736781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Hicks J; Wallis J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower limb angiography: a prospective study comparing carbon dioxide with iodinated contrast material in 30 patients.
    Rolland Y; Duvauferrier R; Lucas A; Gourlay C; Morcet N; Rambeau M; Chaperon J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 9694446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Balloon-Occluded Carbon Dioxide Gas Angiography for Internal Iliac Arteriography and Intervention.
    Kishino M; Nakaminato S; Kitazume Y; Miyasaka N; Kudo T; Saida Y; Tateishi U
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Jul; 41(7):1106-1111. PubMed ID: 29666905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of gadolinium chelates for X-ray digital subtraction angiography.
    Wagner HJ; Kalinowski M; Klose KJ; Alfke H
    Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 11323513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of vascular stenosis with color Doppler flow imaging: in vitro investigations.
    Landwehr P; Schindler R; Heinrich U; Dölken W; Krahe T; Lackner K
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):701-4. PubMed ID: 1994406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography: expanding applications and technical evolution.
    Kerns SR; Hawkins IF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):735-41. PubMed ID: 7863904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.