These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017014)

  • 1. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How experience and training influence mammography expertise.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Mello-Thoms C; Weinstein SP; Orel SG; Sullivan DC; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Oct; 6(10):575-85. PubMed ID: 10516859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation.
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12529023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Feb; 3(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 8796654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
    Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Conant EF; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 17255410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing the development of visual search expertise in pathology residents viewing whole slide images.
    Krupinski EA; Graham AR; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2013 Mar; 44(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 22835956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CAD-aided mammogram training.
    Luo P; Qian W; Romilly P
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):1039-48. PubMed ID: 16087097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading?
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 16488839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
    Poot JD; Chetlen AL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of increased ambient lighting on mass detection in mammograms.
    Pollard BJ; Samei E; Chawla AS; Baker J; Ghate S; Kim C; Soo MS; Hashimoto N
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 19201358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 18572124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search in breast imaging.
    Gandomkar Z; Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20190057. PubMed ID: 31287719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
    Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Head-mounted versus remote eye tracking of radiologists searching for breast cancer: a comparison.
    Mello-Thoms C; Britton C; Abrams G; Hakim C; Shah R; Hardesty L; Maitz G; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 16428056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.