These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017404)

  • 1. On the welfare of possible persons.
    Mahowald MB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(1):2. PubMed ID: 9017404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is birth unfair to the child?
    Steinbock B; McClamrock R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(6):15-21. PubMed ID: 7860282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Give me children or I shall die!" New reproductive technologies and harm to children.
    Cohen CB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(2):19-27. PubMed ID: 8722522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Appropriate damages due to 'wrongful life'].
    Stolker CJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jan; 151(4):240. PubMed ID: 17323879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Society's interest in protection for the fetus.
    Flegel KM
    CMAJ; 1998 Apr; 158(7):895-6. PubMed ID: 9559015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Insufficient justification for granting a wrongful-life claim].
    de Hartogh GA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jan; 151(4):241. PubMed ID: 17323880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rights discourse and neonatal euthanasia.
    Schneider CE
    Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 76(1):151-76. PubMed ID: 11659061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive technology and the child.
    Mosely KL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 11651856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who are the beneficiaries?
    Tännsjö T
    Bioethics; 1992 Oct; 6(4):288-96. PubMed ID: 11652091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ideal of community in the work of the President's Commission.
    Burt RA
    Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In defense of wrongful life: bringing political theory to the defense of a tort.
    Laudor MB
    Fordham Law Rev; 1994 Apr; 62(6):1675-704. PubMed ID: 11659993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who should pay for bad genes?
    Rakowski E
    Calif Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 90(5):1345-414. PubMed ID: 12436972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural law and the 'Declaration on Euthanasia.
    Coleman GD
    Linacre Q; 1981 Aug; 48(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 11649430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioethical considerations in the care of handicapped newborns.
    Devlin D; Magrab PR
    J Pediatr Psychol; 1981 Jun; 6(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 6454772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rabbinic comment: Triage of resources.
    Tendler MD
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 6608668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of life.
    Roupas TG
    Philos Public Aff; 1978; 7(2):154-83. PubMed ID: 11661542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The responsibility of the medical doctor and the life of the patient.
    Poltawska W
    Dolentium Hominum; 1996; 31(11th Yr. No. 1):137-40. PubMed ID: 11655218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protecting the unconceived: nonexistence, avoidability, and reproductive technology.
    Peters PG
    Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):487-548. PubMed ID: 11659319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.