358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017409)
1. In case of emergency: no need for consent.
Brody BA; Katz J; Dula A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(1):7; discussion 7-12. PubMed ID: 9017409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of human subjects; informed consent--FDA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1996 Oct; 61(192):51498-533. PubMed ID: 10161558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
Menasché A; Levine RJ
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements.
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Leibrock LG; Prabhu VC; Kelso TK; Sears TD
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11652322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergency trials 'by popular consent.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2002):6. PubMed ID: 11656475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitively impaired subjects. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med; 1989 Nov; 111(10):843-8. PubMed ID: 2683918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nondevelopmental research on human subjects: the impact of the recommendations of the National Commission.
Levine RJ
Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2359-64. PubMed ID: 892005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.
Tuthill KA
J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research in emergency situations. The role of deferred consent.
Levine RJ
JAMA; 1995 Apr; 273(16):1300-2. PubMed ID: 7715046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
Weijer C
IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An even safer safety net.
Prentice E
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Promoting medical research without sacrificing patient autonomy: legal and ethical issues raised by the waiver of informed consent for emergency research.
Carnahan SJ
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1999; 52(4):565-91. PubMed ID: 12666673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Additional protections for children involved as subjects in research--Department of Health and Human Services. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1983 Mar; 48(46):9814-20. PubMed ID: 10259817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
