BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017742)

  • 1. Effects of perceptual training based upon synthesized voice signals.
    Martin DP; Wolfe VI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 2):1291-8. PubMed ID: 9017742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity.
    Martin D; Fitch J; Wolfe V
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 7474970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2201-11. PubMed ID: 15898661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual analysis in different voice samples: agreement and reliability.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; Ramirez I
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1187-95. PubMed ID: 12186240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups.
    Cho SW; Yin CS; Park YB; Park YJ
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 21051198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; López P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 12697983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types.
    Wolfe V; Fitch J; Martin D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):292-9. PubMed ID: 9415734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.
    Wolfe V; Cornell R; Palmer C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 2072674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise and tremor in the perception of vocal aging in males.
    Harnsberger JD; Brown WS; Shrivastav R; Rothman H
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 19815378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation of selected acoustical parameters and perceptual ratings to voice quality of Down syndrome children.
    Pentz AL; Gilbert HR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Sep; 88(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 6227243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
    Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cultural and language differences in voice quality perception: a preliminary investigation using synthesized signals.
    Yiu EM; Murdoch B; Hird K; Lau P; Ho EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 18332632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial neural network-based classification to screen for dysphonia using psychoacoustic scaling of acoustic voice features.
    Linder R; Albers AE; Hess M; Pöppl SJ; Schönweiler R
    J Voice; 2008 Mar; 22(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 17074463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual Error Analysis of Human and Synthesized Voices.
    Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):516.e5-516.e18. PubMed ID: 28089485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.