These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017742)

  • 21. Performance of Phonatory Deviation Diagrams in Synthesized Voice Analysis.
    Lopes LW; da Silva KE; da Silva Evangelista D; Almeida AA; Silva POC; Lucero J; Behlau M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2017; 69(5-6):246-260. PubMed ID: 29719283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of the fundamental frequencies of children's voices by trained and untrained listeners.
    Wilson FB; Wellen CJ; Kimbarow ML
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Oct; 12(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 6644865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Variability in the digital voice analysis depending on the analyzed vocal, in normal patients and in patients with dysphonia].
    Preciado López JA; Calzada Uriondo MG; Zabaleta López M; García Cano FJ
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2000 Oct; 51(7):618-28. PubMed ID: 11270041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic measurement of voice quality in central dysphonia.
    Hartmann E; von Cramon D
    J Commun Disord; 1984 Nov; 17(6):425-40. PubMed ID: 6520236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types.
    Wolfe VI; Steinfatt TM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Jun; 30(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 3599955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perception of synthesized voice quality in connected speech by Cantonese speakers.
    Yiu EM; Murdoch B; Hird K; Lau P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1091-101. PubMed ID: 12243157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Study on the stability of perceptual evaluation of voice quality].
    Wang G; Yu P; Xu W; Wen W; Wei CS; Huang DY; Hou LZ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 21924100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and perceptual assessment of a synthesizer of disordered voices.
    Fraj S; Schoentgen J; Grenez F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2603-15. PubMed ID: 23039453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pre- and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception.
    van der Molen L; van Rossum MA; Jacobi I; van Son RJ; Smeele LE; Rasch CR; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):664.e25-33. PubMed ID: 22209059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effectiveness of a voice training program for telemarketers.
    de Oliveira AG; Gouveia N; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):815.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22921291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multivariate analysis of objective voice changes after thyroidectomy without laryngeal nerve injury.
    Akyildiz S; Ogut F; Akyildiz M; Engin EZ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 134(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 18559725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia.
    Awan SN; Roy N
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):268-82. PubMed ID: 15907441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Training listeners to report the acoustic correlate of formant-frequency scaling using synthetic voices.
    Barreda S; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1065-77. PubMed ID: 23363122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.