BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9017807)

  • 1. Technical aspects of screen-film radiography, film processing, and quality control.
    Gray JE
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 9017807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screen film processing systems for medical radiography: a historical review.
    Haus AG; Cullinan JE
    Radiographics; 1989 Nov; 9(6):1203-24. PubMed ID: 2685941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance.
    Haus AG
    Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physics and chemistry of film and processing.
    Kitts EI
    Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1467-79; quiz 1464-5. PubMed ID: 8946547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
    Sprawls P; Kitts EL
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
    Brandt GA
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography quality assurance from A to Z.
    Farria DM; Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; DeBruhl N
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):371-85. PubMed ID: 8190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
    Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination of electrostatic discharges in automatic daylight film processor systems. A simple, cost-effective solution. Technical note.
    Asp T; Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 2509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physics overview of screen-film radiography.
    Ritenour ER
    Radiographics; 1996 Jul; 16(4):903-16. PubMed ID: 8835979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Features of the maintenance of automated developing machines].
    Koveshnikov AI
    Med Tekh; 1999; (2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10335507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.