These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9020274)

  • 21. Clinical prediction rules in physical therapy: coming of age?
    Whitman JM; Cleland J; Mintken P
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Mar; 39(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 19252269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Connecting clinical and actuarial prediction with rule-based methods.
    Fokkema M; Smits N; Kelderman H; Penninx BW
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):636-44. PubMed ID: 25642935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Healthcare provider perceptions of clinical prediction rules.
    Richardson S; Khan S; McCullagh L; Kline M; Mann D; McGinn T
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008461. PubMed ID: 26338684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of four clinical prediction rules for estimating risk in heart failure.
    Auble TE; Hsieh M; McCausland JB; Yealy DM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Aug; 50(2):127-35, 135.e1-2. PubMed ID: 17449141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Developing an international register of clinical prediction rules for use in primary care: a descriptive analysis.
    Keogh C; Wallace E; O'Brien KK; Galvin R; Smith SM; Lewis C; Cummins A; Cousins G; Dimitrov BD; Fahey T
    Ann Fam Med; 2014 Jul; 12(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 25024245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A systematic review of clinical decision rules for the diagnosis of influenza.
    Ebell MH; Afonso A
    Ann Fam Med; 2011; 9(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 21242564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of patient location on the performance of clinical models to predict pulmonary embolism.
    Ollenberger GP; Worsley DF
    Thromb Res; 2006; 118(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 16380153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
    Reid MC; Lachs MS; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):645-51. PubMed ID: 7637146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Australian physiotherapists' priorities for the development of clinical prediction rules for low back pain: a qualitative study.
    Haskins R; Osmotherly PG; Southgate E; Rivett DA
    Physiotherapy; 2015 Mar; 101(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25037535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score.
    Tzoulaki I; Liberopoulos G; Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2345-52. PubMed ID: 19952321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Compliance with methodological standards when evaluating ophthalmic diagnostic tests.
    Harper R; Reeves B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Jul; 40(8):1650-7. PubMed ID: 10393031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical prediction rules.
    Maher C
    Phys Ther; 2006 May; 86(5):759; author reply 760. PubMed ID: 16649899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
    Lucassen W; Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; Büller H; van Weert HC
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 21969343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature.
    Cowley LE; Farewell DM; Maguire S; Kemp AM
    Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():16. PubMed ID: 31463368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decision rules and clinical prediction of pneumonia: evaluation of low-yield criteria.
    Singal BM; Hedges JR; Radack KL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1989 Jan; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 2642673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic review of clinical prediction rules for neuroimaging in the evaluation of dementia.
    Gifford DR; Holloway RG; Vickrey BG
    Arch Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 160(18):2855-62. PubMed ID: 11025796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Graphics and statistics for cardiology: clinical prediction rules.
    Woodward M; Tunstall-Pedoe H; Peters SA
    Heart; 2017 Apr; 103(7):538-545. PubMed ID: 28179372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.