These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9020274)

  • 41. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.
    McGinn TG; Guyatt GH; Wyer PC; Naylor CD; Stiell IG; Richardson WS
    JAMA; 2000 Jul; 284(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 10872017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Calibration of clinical prediction rules does not just assess bias.
    Vach W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1296-301. PubMed ID: 24021610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical decision rules, spinal pain classification and prediction of treatment outcome: A discussion of recent reports in the rehabilitation literature.
    Hebert JJ; Fritz JM
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2012 Jun; 20(1):19. PubMed ID: 22726639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Making complex prediction rules applicable for readers: Current practice in random forest literature and recommendations.
    Boulesteix AL; Janitza S; Hornung R; Probst P; Busen H; Hapfelmeier A
    Biom J; 2019 Sep; 61(5):1314-1328. PubMed ID: 30069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards.
    Bogardus ST; Concato J; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1999 May; 281(20):1919-26. PubMed ID: 10349896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Deriving clinical prediction rules from stroke outcome research.
    Hier DB; Edelstein G
    Stroke; 1991 Nov; 22(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 1750053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The reporting of prediction rules must be more predictable.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 25579638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reply to the Letter to the Editor-Clinical prediction rules used to rule out endocarditis must be assessed against a sensitive reference standard.
    Bai AD; Steinberg M; Bell CM; Morris AM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Mar; 24(3):317-320. PubMed ID: 29074156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Development and application of clinical prediction rules to improve decision making in physical therapist practice.
    Childs JD; Cleland JA
    Phys Ther; 2006 Jan; 86(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 16386067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. PHARM - Association Rule Mining for Predictive Health.
    Cheng CW; Martin GS; Wu PY; Wang MD
    IFMBE Proc; 2014; 42():114-117. PubMed ID: 27588027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Practice guidelines and prediction rules should be subject to careful clinical testing.
    Weingarten S
    JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(24):1977-8. PubMed ID: 9200641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rules for collection of clinical data: the eight Rs.
    Zoltie N
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1996 Mar; 13(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 8653237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What does need to know about developing clinical prediction models?
    Abbasi M; Naderi M
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2019 Mar; 10(2):369. PubMed ID: 30594426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical prediction rules.
    Ann Intern Med; 1991 Jan; 114(2):172. PubMed ID: 1984405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Future imperfect: the limitations of clinical prediction models and the limits of clinical prediction.
    Diamond GA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3 Suppl A):12A-22A. PubMed ID: 2768728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A partial order for the M-of-N rule-extraction algorithm.
    Maire F
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 1997; 8(6):1542-4. PubMed ID: 18255754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. When (not) to apply clinical risk prediction models to improve patient care.
    Lee A; Moonesinghe SR
    Anaesthesia; 2023 May; 78(5):547-550. PubMed ID: 36860118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Limited Predictive Power of the Pauling Rules.
    George J; Waroquiers D; Di Stefano D; Petretto G; Rignanese GM; Hautier G
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2020 May; 59(19):7569-7575. PubMed ID: 32065708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Laser-induced modifications of selection rules in the Auger effect.
    Fiordilino E; Zangara R; Ferrante G
    Phys Rev A Gen Phys; 1988 Oct; 38(8):4369-4372. PubMed ID: 9900898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical prediction rules: time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity?
    Huijbregts P
    J Man Manip Ther; 2007; 15(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 19066639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.