These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9022723)

  • 1. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies.
    Linder J; Zahniser D
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
    Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.
    Bolick DR; Hellman DJ
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
    Austin RM; Ramzy I
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology Papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte® cell sorter imaging system.
    Delga A; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Marée R; Lambert C; Delvenne P
    Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 25277345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
    Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
    Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study.
    Pan Q; Belinson JL; Li L; Pretorius RG; Qiao YL; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Wu LY; Rong SD; Sun YT
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12585030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
    Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
    Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
    Bishop JW
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ; Valente PT
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma.
    Hutchinson ML; Zahniser DJ; Sherman ME; Herrero R; Alfaro M; Bratti MC; Hildesheim A; Lorincz AT; Greenberg MD; Morales J; Schiffman M
    Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM; Frist S
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hyperchromatic crowded groups in cervical cytology--differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
    Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Wang E; Haja J; Colgan TJ;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 16519560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen-preparation device for cervical cytology. Preliminary results.
    Wilbur DC; Facik MS; Rutkowski MA; Mulford DK; Atkison KM
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9022722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
    Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.