194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9022723)
1. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.
Bolick DR; Hellman DJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology Papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte® cell sorter imaging system.
Delga A; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Marée R; Lambert C; Delvenne P
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 25277345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study.
Pan Q; Belinson JL; Li L; Pretorius RG; Qiao YL; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Wu LY; Rong SD; Sun YT
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12585030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
Bishop JW
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma.
Hutchinson ML; Zahniser DJ; Sherman ME; Herrero R; Alfaro M; Bratti MC; Hildesheim A; Lorincz AT; Greenberg MD; Morales J; Schiffman M
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
Solomon HM; Frist S
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hyperchromatic crowded groups in cervical cytology--differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Wang E; Haja J; Colgan TJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 16519560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen-preparation device for cervical cytology. Preliminary results.
Wilbur DC; Facik MS; Rutkowski MA; Mulford DK; Atkison KM
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9022722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
