131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9022728)
21. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system.
Abulafia O; Sherer DM
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Apr; 54(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 10198930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PAPNET computer-aided rescreening for detection of benign and malignant glandular elements in cervicovaginal smears: a review of 61 cases.
Sturgis CD; Isoe C; McNeal NE; Yu GH; DeFrias DV
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Apr; 18(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 9557269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. AutoCyte SCREEN interactive automated primary cytology screening system. A preliminary evaluation.
Takahashi M; Kimura M; Akagi A; Naitoh M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 9479338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears.
Ashfaq R; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7587873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
Bartels PH; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears.
Keyhani-Rofagha S; Palma T; O'Toole RV
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neuromedical Systems, Inc.
Mango LJ
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8604575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective and randomised public-health trial on neural network-assisted screening for cervical cancer in Finland: results of the first year.
Nieminen P; Hakama M; Viikki M; Tarkkanen J; Anttila A
Int J Cancer; 2003 Jan; 103(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 12471627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reproducibility in double scanning of cervical smears with the PAPNET system.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 10934954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficacy: a study of 63 false-negative smears.
Boon ME; Kok LP; Nygaard-Nielsen M; Holm K; Holund B
Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec; 7(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 7892166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of the Pathfinder in a cytology laboratory.
Coggi G; Bulfamante G; Romeo M; Falleni M; Aldovini A; Cirillo G; Federico D; Roncalli M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 9022740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of automated systems for the analysis of cervical smears.
Coleman DV
Cytopathology; 1998 Dec; 9(6):359-68. PubMed ID: 9861528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist.
Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME; Beck S
Cytopathology; 1994 Aug; 5(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 7948757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
