These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9022960)

  • 21. [Effect of fibrin on osseointegration of bioactive glass-ceramic materials--experimental study].
    Urban K; Povýsil C; Spelda S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 11706539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Histological comparison of early wound healing following dense hydroxyapatite granule grafting and barrier placement in surgically-created bone defects neighboring implants.
    Takeshita F; Ayukawa Y; Iyama S; Suetsugu T; Oishi M
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):924-32. PubMed ID: 9358359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bond strength measurements of fissure sealant to glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cement.
    Gray GB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 7920406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative biological testing of Ketac-Bond glass ionomer cement].
    Beer R; Gängler P; Wutzler P; Krehan F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Apr; 45(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 2257828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements.
    Sasanaluckit P; Albustany KR; Doherty PJ; Williams DF
    Biomaterials; 1993 Oct; 14(12):906-16. PubMed ID: 8268383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physical properties of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement modified with micro and nano-hydroxyapatite.
    Lee JJ; Lee YK; Choi BJ; Lee JH; Choi HJ; Son HK; Hwang JW; Kim SO
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2010 Aug; 10(8):5270-6. PubMed ID: 21125881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Benefits and drawbacks of zinc in glass ionomer bone cements.
    Brauer DS; Gentleman E; Farrar DF; Stevens MM; Hill RG
    Biomed Mater; 2011 Aug; 6(4):045007. PubMed ID: 21680957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The constitution, physical properties and biocompatibility of modified accelerated cement.
    Camilleri J; Montesin FE; Juszczyk AS; Papaioannou S; Curtis RV; Donald FM; Ford TR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 17659330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Investigation of biocompatibility of the apatite cement].
    Pielka S; Juszkiewicz W; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Solski L
    Polim Med; 2003; 33(3):13-8. PubMed ID: 14696520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Long-term outcome after frontal sinus obliteration with an ionomer bone substitute in the cat. I: Histological results].
    Dazert S; Baier G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Aug; 76(8):480-3. PubMed ID: 9376031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of calcium phosphate cement/PLGA microparticle composites.
    Link DP; van den Dolder J; van den Beucken JJ; Cuijpers VM; Wolke JG; Mikos AG; Jansen JA
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(3):760-9. PubMed ID: 18200545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant.
    Smales RJ; Lee YK; Lo FW; Tse CC; Chung MS
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 9545905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a pilot study.
    Froum S; Cho SC; Rosenberg E; Rohrer M; Tarnow D
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 11846205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs.
    Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Martins MC; Zenóbio EG; Spolidoro LC; Marcantonio E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18783409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biocompatibility of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin used as a dental luting agent.
    Nakagawa K; Saita M; Ikeda T; Hirota M; Park W; Lee MC; Ogawa T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 25882972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Properties of a proline-containing glass ionomer dental cement.
    Ansari S; Moshaverinia M; Roohpour N; Chee WW; Schricker SR; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 23998626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Ionomer cement as bone substitute in the middle ear of the rabbit].
    Geyer G
    HNO; 1997 Apr; 45(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 9221262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Some physical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement.
    Mount GJ
    Int Dent J; 1995 Apr; 45(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 7558351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro biocompatibility of a novel Fe2O3 based glass ionomer cement.
    Hurrell-Gillingham K; Reaney IM; Brook I; Hatton PV
    J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):533-8. PubMed ID: 16530912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.