BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9023694)

  • 1. Evaluation of vascular patterns of cervical lymph nodes with power Doppler sonography.
    Giovagnorio F; Caiazzo R; Avitto A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1997 Feb; 25(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9023694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
    Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
    Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
    Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does ultrasound contrast agent improve the diagnostic value of colour and power Doppler sonography in superficial lymph node enlargement?
    Schulte-Altedorneburg G; Demharter J; Linné R; Droste DW; Bohndorf K; Bücklein W
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Dec; 48(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 14652142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Ariji Y; Kimura Y; Hayashi N; Onitsuka T; Yonetsu K; Hayashi K; Ariji E; Kobayashi T; Nakamura T
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Feb; 19(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 9504483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
    Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
    Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
    Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated?
    Ahuja A; Ying M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 29(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 12706185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity: a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography.
    Ahuja AT; Ying M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 30(12):1557-64. PubMed ID: 15617828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Lymph Nodes: Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
    Sim JK; Lee JY; Hong HS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3025-3036. PubMed ID: 30945325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography].
    Ayata Z; Apaydin M; Varer M; Sarsilmaz A; Calli C; Rezanko T
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of Doppler spectral analysis and power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathies.
    Wu CH; Chang YL; Hsu WC; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hsieh FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):503-9. PubMed ID: 9694484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
    Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
    Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
    Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of metastases and reactive lymph nodes in Doppler sonography using an ultrasound contrast enhancer.
    Mäurer J; Willam C; Schroeder R; Hidajad N; Hell B; Bier J; Weber S; Felix R
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Aug; 32(8):441-6. PubMed ID: 9258731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of color doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer patients.
    Jayachandran S; Sachdeva SK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):557-8. PubMed ID: 23257501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status of power Doppler and color Doppler sonography in the differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions.
    Steinkamp HJ; Wissgott C; Rademaker J; Felix R
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1785-93. PubMed ID: 12111070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumors.
    Moritz JD; Ludwig A; Oestmann JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10789776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Differential diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes: Usefulness of gray-scale and color-power doppler sonography].
    Ekşioğlu AS; Ozdemir A; Ozdemir H
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 14730954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.