These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 902411)

  • 1. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; Aronsson T; Falk H; de Verdier CH
    Clin Chem; 1977 Oct; 23(10):1857-67. PubMed ID: 902411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and evaluation of statistical control procedures: applications of a computer "quality control simulator" program.
    Westgard JO; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1981 Sep; 27(9):1536-45. PubMed ID: 7261331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined Shewhart-cusum control chart for improved quality control in clinical chemistry.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; Aronsson T; de Verdier CH
    Clin Chem; 1977 Oct; 23(10):1881-7. PubMed ID: 902415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multirule quality control procedures.
    Carey RN
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 1809061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of quality-control rules used in clinical chemistry laboratories.
    Bishop J; Nix AB
    Clin Chem; 1993 Aug; 39(8):1638-49. PubMed ID: 8353950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of a between-run component of variation, choice of control limits, and shape of error distribution on the performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control.
    Westgard JO; Falk H; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1979 Mar; 25(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 262178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent systematic error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 1547552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposed guidelines for the internal quality control of analytical results in the medical laboratory.
    Petersen PH; Ricós C; Stöckl D; Libeer JC; Baadenhuijsen H; Fraser C; Thienpont L
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 Dec; 34(12):983-99. PubMed ID: 8986407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer evaluation of statistical procedures, and a new quality-control statistical procedure.
    Blum AS
    Clin Chem; 1985 Feb; 31(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 3967350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quality control simulator for design and evaluation of internal quality control procedures.
    Groth T; Falk H; Westgard JO
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():195-201. PubMed ID: 6599523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance characteristics of several rules for self-interpretation of proficiency testing data.
    Carey RN; Cembrowski GS; Garber CC; Zaki Z
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 16048412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality-costs of an analytical process: 1. Development of quality-costs models based on predictive value theory.
    Westgard JO; Hyltoft Petersen P; Groth T
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():221-7. PubMed ID: 6599527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nested control procedures for internal analytical quality control. Theoretical design and practical evaluation.
    Aronsson T; Groth T
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():51-64. PubMed ID: 6599530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnostic accuracy of quality control rules.
    Åsberg A; Bolann BJ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2024 Jul; 84(4):219-224. PubMed ID: 38804871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 3 options for choosing control limits in biochemistry testing.
    Manzocchi S; Furman E; Freeman K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 28165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1547553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the performance characteristics of quality-control procedures when error persists until detection.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Oct; 37(10 Pt 1):1720-4. PubMed ID: 1914171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error models and quality control performance.
    Chiecchio A; Malvano R
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 May; 34(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8790978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) rule compared with traditionally used quality control rules.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 16599831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choosing quality-control systems to detect maximum clinically allowable analytical errors.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1989 Feb; 35(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2914374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.