370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9024352)
1. Long-term outcome of arthrocentesis for sudden-onset, persistent, severe closed lock of the temporomandibular joint.
Nitzan DW; Samson B; Better H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Feb; 55(2):151-7; discussion 157-8. PubMed ID: 9024352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is there a role for arthrocentesis in recapturing the displaced disc in patients with closed lock of the temporomandibular joint?
Sembronio S; Albiero AM; Toro C; Robiony M; Politi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):274-80; discussion 281. PubMed ID: 18061492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closed lock (MRI fixed disc): a comparison of arthrocentesis and arthroscopy.
Sanromán JF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 33(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 15145035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements.
Alpaslan GH; Alpaslan C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):613-8; discussion 618-9. PubMed ID: 11381380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction.
Diraçoğlu D; Saral IB; Keklik B; Kurt H; Emekli U; Ozçakar L; Karan A; Aksoy C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 19272808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arthrocentesis and stabilizing splint are the treatment of choice for acute intermittent closed lock in patients with bruxism.
Ghanem WA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 20598897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining predictor variables for treatment outcomes of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distention of the temporomandibular joint.
Emshoff R; Rudisch A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jul; 62(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 15218559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year retrospective evaluation of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis.
Alpaslan C; Dolwick MF; Heft MW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 32(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 12767872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effectiveness of arthrocentesis in acute and chronic closed lock: analysis of clinical and arthroscopic findings.
Sakamoto I; Yoda T; Tsukahara H; Imai H; Enomoto S
Cranio; 2000 Oct; 18(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 11202846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint with closed lock at 3 years follow-up.
Hosaka H; Murakami K; Goto K; Iizuka T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 8936512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage for the treatment of closed lock: a follow-up study.
Dimitroulis G; Dolwick MF; Martinez A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Feb; 33(1):23-6; discussion 26-7. PubMed ID: 7718523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporomandibular joint internal derangement and osteoarthrosis: are effusion and bone marrow edema prognostic indicators for arthrocentesis and hydraulic distention?
Emshoff R; Rudisch A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17174766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension on the temporomandibular joint disk position.
Emshoff R; Rudisch A; Bösch R; Gassner R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 10710449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term evaluation of arthrocentesis for the treatment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint.
Carvajal WA; Laskin DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Aug; 58(8):852-5; discussion 856-7. PubMed ID: 10935583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical factors affecting the outcome of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension of the temporomandibular joint.
Emshoff R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Oct; 100(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 16182161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between effectiveness of arthrocentesis under sufficient pressure and conditions of the temporomandibular joint.
Yura S; Totsuka Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 15690292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis on synovial fluid mediator level of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: implications for treatment outcome.
Emshoff R; Puffer P; Strobl H; Gassner R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 29(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 10970078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic factors in arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: evaluation of 100 patients with internal derangement.
Nishimura M; Segami N; Kaneyama K; Suzuki T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 59(8):874-7; discussion 878. PubMed ID: 11474440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporomandibular joint "open lock" versus condylar dislocation: signs and symptoms, imaging, treatment, and pathogenesis.
Nitzan DW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 May; 60(5):506-11; discussion 512-3. PubMed ID: 11988925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporomandibular joint internal derangement: relationship between joint pain and MR grading of effusion and total protein concentration in the joint fluid.
Güler N; Uçkan S; Imirzalioğlu P; Açikgözoğlu S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 15897289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
