347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9024725)
1. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction.
Burke HB; Goodman PH; Rosen DB; Henson DE; Weinstein JN; Harrell FE; Marks JR; Winchester DP; Bostwick DG
Cancer; 1997 Feb; 79(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 9024725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting response to adjuvant and radiation therapy in patients with early stage breast carcinoma.
Burke HB; Hoang A; Iglehart JD; Marks JR
Cancer; 1998 Mar; 82(5):874-7. PubMed ID: 9486576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma using artificial neural networks.
Sato F; Shimada Y; Selaru FM; Shibata D; Maeda M; Watanabe G; Mori Y; Stass SA; Imamura M; Meltzer SJ
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 103(8):1596-605. PubMed ID: 15751017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial neural networks applied to outcome prediction for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions.
Bottaci L; Drew PJ; Hartley JE; Hadfield MB; Farouk R; Lee PW; Macintyre IM; Duthie GS; Monson JR
Lancet; 1997 Aug; 350(9076):469-72. PubMed ID: 9274582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prognostic model that makes quantitative estimates of probability of relapse for breast cancer patients.
De Laurentiis M; De Placido S; Bianco AR; Clark GM; Ravdin PM
Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Dec; 5(12):4133-9. PubMed ID: 10632351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which is a more accurate predictor in colorectal survival analysis? Nine data mining algorithms vs. the TNM staging system.
Gao P; Zhou X; Wang ZN; Song YX; Tong LL; Xu YY; Yue ZY; Xu HM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e42015. PubMed ID: 22848691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer.
Lundin M; Lundin J; Burke HB; Toikkanen S; Pylkkänen L; Joensuu H
Oncology; 1999 Nov; 57(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10575312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial neural networking model for the prediction of post-hepatectomy survival of patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma.
Qiao G; Li J; Huang A; Yan Z; Lau WY; Shen F
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2014-20. PubMed ID: 24989634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of preoperative artificial neural network based on blood biomarkers and clinicopathological parameters for predicting long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer.
Que SJ; Chen QY; Qing-Zhong ; Liu ZY; Wang JB; Lin JX; Lu J; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Zheng HL; Li P; Zheng CH; Huang CM; Xie JW
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 25(43):6451-6464. PubMed ID: 31798281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of an artificial neural network to determine prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients.
Gohari MR; Biglarian A; Bakhshi E; Pourhoseingholi MA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(6):1469-72. PubMed ID: 22126483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference.
Yarbro JW; Page DL; Fielding LP; Partridge EE; Murphy GP
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2436-46. PubMed ID: 10590388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer.
Manilich EA; Kiran RP; Radivoyevitch T; Lavery I; Fazio VW; Remzi FH
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Nov; 213(5):579-588, 588.e1-2. PubMed ID: 21925905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of survival from carcinoma of oesophagus and oesophago-gastric junction following surgical resection using an artificial neural network.
Mofidi R; Deans C; Duff MD; de Beaux AC; Paterson Brown S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 32(5):533-9. PubMed ID: 16618533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting post-treatment survivability of patients with breast cancer using Artificial Neural Network methods.
Wang TN; Cheng CH; Chiu HW
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1290-3. PubMed ID: 24109931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma.
Han M; Snow PB; Brandt JM; Partin AW
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(8 Suppl):1661-6. PubMed ID: 11309765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating additional factors into the TNM staging for cutaneous melanoma by machine learning.
Yang CQ; Wang H; Liu Z; Hueman MT; Bhaskaran A; Henson DE; Sheng L; Chen D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257949. PubMed ID: 34591891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial neural networks for cancer research: outcome prediction.
Burke HB
Semin Surg Oncol; 1994; 10(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 8115788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.
Lu J; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX
Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 22(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 23787074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of Overall Survival and Novel Classification of Patients with Gastric Cancer Using the Survival Recurrent Network.
Oh SE; Seo SW; Choi MG; Sohn TS; Bae JM; Kim S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 25(5):1153-1159. PubMed ID: 29497908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing a modified-AJCC TNM staging system in the New South Wales Cancer Registry, Australia.
Lawrance S; Bui C; Mahindra V; Arcorace M; Cooke-Yarborough C
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):850. PubMed ID: 31462255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
