These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 902647)

  • 1. Exercise effects on the time of reactions to auditory stimuli.
    Szmodis I
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1977 Jun; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 902647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateral differences in dynamics of latencies of a simple motor response to acoustic stimuli of increasing intensity.
    Vol'f NV; Tsvetovskii SB
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 3837746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The crossed-uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized auditory stimuli is not a measure of interhemispheric transmission time: evidence from the split brain.
    Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 128(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 10501816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac cycle phase and movement and reaction times.
    Saari MJ; Pappas BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):767-70. PubMed ID: 1272724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P300 and long-term physical exercise.
    Polich J; Lardon MT
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Oct; 103(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 9368494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic aerobic exercise and components of reaction time in older women.
    Baylor AM; Spirduso WW
    J Gerontol; 1988 Sep; 43(5):P121-6. PubMed ID: 3418038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [On the problem of cooperation of the reactions of hands: Communication III. Cooperation of hand reactions to auditory and visual stimuli in patients with focal lesions of the brainstem and diencephalon].
    Blinkov SM; Nikandrov MG
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18365640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse imaging of the auditory oddball task with functional MRI.
    Müller BW; Stude P; Nebel K; Wiese H; Ladd ME; Forsting M; Jueptner M
    Neuroreport; 2003 Aug; 14(12):1597-601. PubMed ID: 14502083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reaction time facilitation by acoustic task-irrelevant stimuli is not related to startle.
    Lipp OV; Kaplan DM; Purkis HM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Dec; 409(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 17010519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of spatial-temporal parameters of acoustic stimuli in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy].
    Al'man IaA; Vaĭtulevich SF; Kotelenko LM; Fed'ko LI; Sanotskaia NN
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1995; 21(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 7698559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory event-related potentials and reaction times in migraine children.
    Buodo G; Palomba D; Sarlo M; Naccarella C; Battistella PA
    Cephalalgia; 2004 Jul; 24(7):554-63. PubMed ID: 15196298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateral difference in reaction times to lateralized auditory stimuli.
    Gutnik BJ; Mackie HW; Guo W; Nicholson J
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 45(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 11211572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Spectral and temporal characteristics of long-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Bakaĭ EA; Marchuk IV; Slavinskiĭ EIu; Verba VG
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3979713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The spectral characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Bilian RN; Manasian KA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 10752302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are you able not to react to what you hear? Inhibition behavior measured with an auditory Go/NoGo paradigm.
    Wegmann E; Brand M; Snagowski J; Schiebener J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 39(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 27410426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postural prioritization is differentially altered in healthy older compared to younger adults during visual and auditory coded spatial multitasking.
    Liston MB; Bergmann JH; Keating N; Green DA; Pavlou M
    Gait Posture; 2014 Jan; 39(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 23891026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relation of repetition effect and response programming in a speeded choice task.
    Ito M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):503-14. PubMed ID: 10483644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reactions of human auditory cortex to a change in tone duration.
    Kaukoranta E; Sams M; Hari R; Hämäläinen M; Näätänen R
    Hear Res; 1989 Aug; 41(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 2793610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of aerobic exercise on auditory and visual reaction times: a prospective study.
    Garg M; Lata H; Walia L; Goyal O
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2013; 57(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 24617163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.