1000 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9026557)
1. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wentzensen N; Bergeron C; Cas F; Vinokurova S; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17186505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening.
Kennedy AW; Salmieri SS; Wirth SL; Biscotti CV; Tuason LJ; Travarca MJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8898161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Howell LP; Davis RL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of atypical cervical cytology in pregnancy.
Kaminski PF; Lyon DS; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Podczaski ES
Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):340-3. PubMed ID: 1418129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
