184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9027115)
1. ["Virtual reality" in published sciences?].
Niethard FU
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 9027115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review unmasked.
Brunier G
J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How original is your writing?
McClelland H
Accid Emerg Nurs; 2006 Jul; 14(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 16815015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Where did the scientific method go?
Noseda M; McLean GR
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18183010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Response to Where did the scientific method go?
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):29. PubMed ID: 18183012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The last judgment?].
Dunning AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Jan; 131(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 3821965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?].
Ziegler A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2077. PubMed ID: 19802770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding plagiarism in academic writing.
Anderson I
Nurs Stand; 2009 Jan 7-13; 23(18):35-7. PubMed ID: 19186631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "It's déjà vu all over again".
Greenebaum B
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Dec; 24(8):529-30. PubMed ID: 14603471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Choosing our words carefully: plagiarism in the internet age.
Bartley GB; Albert DM; Liesegang TJ
Ophthalmology; 2014 Apr; 121(4):807-8. PubMed ID: 24694521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editor's note: plagiarism.
Alvares O
J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1099. PubMed ID: 18923088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The problem of plagiarism.
Cronin SN
Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2007; 26(6):244-5. PubMed ID: 18090142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Journals step up plagiarism policing.
Butler D
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7303):167. PubMed ID: 20613810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Celebrating and sharing diversity through standardized, high quality publications.
Patsdaughter CA
J Cult Divers; 2003; 10(2):39-41. PubMed ID: 14508923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retraction of Scientific Writing.
Pollock NW
Wilderness Environ Med; 2020 Sep; 31(3):257-258. PubMed ID: 32826165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
Senturia SD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plagiarism: an unprofessional and dishonest trend creeping into modern writing of research and review papers.
Stephens MM
Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 15(2):57. PubMed ID: 19410168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
