These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9027541)

  • 41. Current merchandising practices and characteristics of beef wholesale rib usage in three U.S. cities.
    Wulf DM; Romans JR; Costello WJ
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jan; 72(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 8138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of hot-fat trimming on factors associated with the subprimal yield of beef carcasses.
    Ahmed PO; Miller MF; Shackelford SD; Johnson LP; Williams SE; McCann MA; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 1548206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Economics of callipyge lamb production.
    Busboom JR; Wahl TI; Snowder GD
    J Anim Sci; 1999; 77 Suppl 2():243-8. PubMed ID: 15526802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Characteristics of lamb carcasses of contrasting subjective muscularity.
    Purchas RW; Wilkin GH
    Meat Sci; 1995; 41(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 22060206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using the near-infrared system to sort various beef middle and end muscle cuts into tenderness categories.
    Price DM; Hilton GG; VanOverbeke DL; Morgan JB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 17965325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis.
    Steiner R; Wyle AM; Vote DJ; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Wise JW; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2239-46. PubMed ID: 12968699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of freezing and thawing rates on tenderness, sensory quality, and retail display of beef subprimals.
    Hergenreder JE; Hosch JJ; Varnold KA; Haack AL; Senaratne LS; Pokharel S; Beauchamp C; Lobaugh B; Calkins CR
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jan; 91(1):483-90. PubMed ID: 23100592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):466-73. PubMed ID: 12643491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses.
    Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Kemp KE; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1604-12. PubMed ID: 9655580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting percentage of retail yield from carcass measurements, the yield grading equation, and closely trimmed, boxed beef weights.
    Reiling BA; Rouse GH; Duello DA
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 1644688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain.
    van Wijk HJ; Arts DJ; Matthews JO; Webster M; Ducro BJ; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Feb; 83(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 15644503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of alternative fabrication specifications to increase gross value of pork carcasses.
    Bryan EE; Overholt MF; Kim GD; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    Transl Anim Sci; 2018 Feb; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 32704686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of electronic technology to assess lamb carcass composition.
    Berg EP; Neary MK; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2433-44. PubMed ID: 9303462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Characterization of cutability and palatability attributes among different slaughter groups of beef cattle.
    Stiffler DM; Griffin CL; Murphey CE; Smith GC; Savell JW
    Meat Sci; 1985; 13(3):167-83. PubMed ID: 22055633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem.
    Apple JK; Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Wise JW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4845-57. PubMed ID: 1808179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. National beef market basket survey.
    Savell JW; Harris JJ; Cross HR; Hale DS; Beasley LC
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jul; 69(7):2883-93. PubMed ID: 1885398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantification of saleable meat yield using objective measurements captured by video image analysis technology.
    McEvers TJ; Hutcheson JP; Lawrence TE
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3294-300. PubMed ID: 22966082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fabrication yields of serially harvested calf-fed Holstein steers fed zilpaterol hydrochloride.
    May ND; McEvers TJ; Walter LJ; Reed JA; Hutcheson JP; Lawrence TE
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 28380524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. B-mode, real-time ultrasound for estimating carcass measures in live sheep: accuracy of ultrasound measures and their relationships with carcass yield and value.
    Leeds TD; Mousel MR; Notter DR; Zerby HN; Moffet CA; Lewis GS
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Nov; 86(11):3203-14. PubMed ID: 18567727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.