121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9027945)
1. Beam flatness perturbation effects of a perforated thermoplastic immobilization device on 6 and 12 MeV electron beams.
Van Way RL; Williams RO; Johnstone PA; Papin PJ
Radiother Oncol; 1996 Dec; 41(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 9027945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors.
Gilbeau L; Octave-Prignot M; Loncol T; Renard L; Scalliet P; Grégoire V
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 11166866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
Ding GX; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sharpening the penumbra of high energy electron beams with low weight narrow photon beams.
Korevaar EW; van Vliet RJ; Woudstra E; Heijmen BJ; Huizenga H
Radiother Oncol; 1998 Aug; 48(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 9783895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six dimensional analysis with daily stereoscopic x-ray imaging of intrafraction patient motion in head and neck treatments using five points fixation masks.
Linthout N; Verellen D; Tournel K; Storme G
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):504-13. PubMed ID: 16532958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interface perturbation effects in high-energy electron beams.
Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):687-705. PubMed ID: 12699189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm to electron arc therapy.
Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Boyd RA; Tucker SL; Antolak JA
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2369-83. PubMed ID: 16898439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of beam modifiers and immobilization devices on the dose in the build-up region.
Fontenla DP; Napoli JJ; Hunt M; Fass D; McCormick B; Kutcher GJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Aug; 30(1):211-9. PubMed ID: 8083116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized trial on two types of thermoplastic masks for patient immobilization during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer.
Sharp L; Lewin F; Johansson H; Payne D; Gerhardsson A; Rutqvist LE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):250-6. PubMed ID: 15629618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric properties of a scanned beam microtron at low monitor unit settings: importance for conformal therapy.
Humm JL; Larsson A; Lief EP
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 8815374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT.
Boda-Heggemann J; Walter C; Rahn A; Wertz H; Loeb I; Lohr F; Wenz F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1568-75. PubMed ID: 17126213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental verification of the application of lateral buildup ratio on the 4-MeV electron beam.
Chow JC; Newman S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006; 7(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16518315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose enhancement in bone in electron beam therapy.
Prasad SC; Ames TE; Howard TB; Bassano DA; Chung CT; King GA; Sagerman RH
Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):513-6. PubMed ID: 6424176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of the use of external aluminium targets for portal imaging in a medical accelerator using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation.
Kim H; Kim B; Baek J; Oh Y; Yun S; Jang H
Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170376. PubMed ID: 29338304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
Cardenas CE; Nitsch PL; Kudchadker RJ; Howell RM; Kry SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The peripheral dose outside the applicator in electron beams of Oncor linear accelerator.
Iktueren B; Bilge H; Karacam S; Atkovar G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 22025738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of repositioning accuracy of two commercially available immobilization systems for treatment of head-and-neck tumors using simulation computed tomography imaging.
Rotondo RL; Sultanem K; Lavoie I; Skelly J; Raymond L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Apr; 70(5):1389-96. PubMed ID: 18207659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
