These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9028225)

  • 1. Accuracy of wax, autopolymerized, and light-polymerized resin pattern materials.
    Iglesias A; Powers JM; Pierpont HP
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 9028225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the accuracy of patterns processed from an inlay casting wax, an auto-polymerized resin and a light-cured resin pattern material.
    Rajagopal P; Chitre V; Aras MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 22945702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of occlusal loading and thermocycling on the marginal gaps of light-polymerized and autopolymerized resin provisional crowns.
    Dubois RJ; Kyriakakis P; Weiner S; Vaidyanathan TK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 10424978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the marginal adaptation of a thermoplastic resin, a light cured wax and an inlay casting wax on stone dies: An
    Gopalan RP; Nair VV; Harshakumar K; Ravichandran R; Lylajam S; Viswambaran P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 29430135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of Class II (MO and MOD) fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Miura M; Nishimura N; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 11203869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laboratory evaluation of the construction of resin-bonded cast restorations.
    Chana HS; Pearson GJ; Ibbetson RJ
    Br Dent J; 1997 Aug; 183(4):130-4. PubMed ID: 9293129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-fusing counterdies for measuring accuracy of dies or impression materials.
    Stackhouse JA; Yoon W; Von Hagen S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Feb; 71(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 8126680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of four inlay casting waxes on stone, titanium, and zirconia dies.
    Michalakis KX; Kapsampeli V; Kitsou A; Kirmanidou Y; Fotiou A; Pissiotis AL; Calvani PL; Hirayama H; Kudara Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 24674809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of investment type and sprue number on the casting accuracy of titanium crown margins.
    Leal MB; Paulino SM; Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16399274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
    Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture analysis of CAD-CAM high-density polymers used for interim implant-supported fixed, cantilevered prostheses.
    Yilmaz B; Alp G; Seidt J; Johnston WM; Vitter R; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 29310879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Defects of Indirect Inlay Patterns Fabricated Using Additive Manufacturing and Traditional Methods - An Ex Vivo Study.
    Peddi SS; Taduri V; Shivakumar A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 31145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials.
    Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.