These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9028283)

  • 1. An effective technique for extended proximal contacts in composite resin restorations.
    Lacy AM
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 8(3):287-93; quiz 295. PubMed ID: 9028283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New instrumentation and technique for obtaining consistent interproximal contacts of direct Class II composite restorations.
    Slone CE
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):15-20; quiz 22. PubMed ID: 7994013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The elusive tight contact with composite restorations. How to achieve it.
    Karst LE
    Dent Today; 2003 Nov; 22(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 14650341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II composite restorations and proximal concavities: clinical implications and management.
    Patras M; Doukoudakis S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 22788722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing proximal contacts with pre-polymerized composite inserts.
    Dunn WJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 15279490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
    Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving anatomic proximal contacts with direct composite resin restorations.
    Rada RE
    Dent Today; 2000 Mar; 19(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 12522857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal marginal overhang of composite restorations in relation to placement technique of separation rings.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Huysmans MC
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 21942287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites.
    Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.