BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9028283)

  • 1. An effective technique for extended proximal contacts in composite resin restorations.
    Lacy AM
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 8(3):287-93; quiz 295. PubMed ID: 9028283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New instrumentation and technique for obtaining consistent interproximal contacts of direct Class II composite restorations.
    Slone CE
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):15-20; quiz 22. PubMed ID: 7994013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The elusive tight contact with composite restorations. How to achieve it.
    Karst LE
    Dent Today; 2003 Nov; 22(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 14650341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II composite restorations and proximal concavities: clinical implications and management.
    Patras M; Doukoudakis S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 22788722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing proximal contacts with pre-polymerized composite inserts.
    Dunn WJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 15279490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
    Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieving anatomic proximal contacts with direct composite resin restorations.
    Rada RE
    Dent Today; 2000 Mar; 19(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 12522857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal marginal overhang of composite restorations in relation to placement technique of separation rings.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Huysmans MC
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 21942287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites.
    Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.