158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9029302)
1. Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement.
Lu Z; McKellop H
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Feb; 34(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 9029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taper-lock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
Norman TL; Thyagarajan G; Saligrama VC; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1325-33. PubMed ID: 11522312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axisymmetric finite element analysis of a debonded total hip stem with an unsupported distal tip.
Norman TL; Saligrama VC; Hustosky KT; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 8872263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1569-75. PubMed ID: 8945655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Jul; 79(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 9250762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling debonded stem-cement interface for hip implants: effect of residual stresses.
Nuño N; Amabili M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11779645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement-bone interface.
Kaneuji A; Yamada K; Hirosaki K; Takano M; Matsumoto T
Acta Orthop; 2009 Jun; 80(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19421909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model.
Mann KA; Bartel DL; Wright TM; Burstein AH
J Biomech; 1995 Sep; 28(9):1067-78. PubMed ID: 7559676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem.
Caouette C; Bureau MN; Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Nuño N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 May; 45():90-100. PubMed ID: 25688031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Aug; (329):326-36. PubMed ID: 8769468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem.
Nuño N; Avanzolini G
J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):849-52. PubMed ID: 12021006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of stem preheating and precooling on residual stress formation at stem/cement interface for cemented hip implants.
Madrala A; Nuño N
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Apr; 93(1):258-65. PubMed ID: 20091924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
