These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9029466)

  • 1. The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9029466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro study of a surface wetting agent for addition reaction silicone impressions.
    Robinson PB; Dunne SM; Millar BJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):390-3. PubMed ID: 8196005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of three wetting agents used to facilitate the pouring of dies.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Nesbit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 8531149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vivo study of a clinical surfactant used with poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):707-9. PubMed ID: 9180409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detail reproduction of soft tissue: a comparison of impression materials.
    Pratten DH; Novetsky M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 2051353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9656175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study to determine the wettability and castability of different elastomeric impression materials.
    Reddy GV; Reddy NS; Itttigi J; Jagadeesh KN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 22918010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwashes as a surfactant for addition-reaction silicone impressions.
    Reshad M; Nesbit M; Petrie A; Setchell D
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Mar; 17(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 19378615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.
    Dounis GS; Ziebert GJ; Dounis KS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 2051350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of viscosity to porosities in automixed elastomeric impressions.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Clin Mater; 1991; 7(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10149132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.