These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9032145)

  • 1. NIH consensus panel spurs discontent.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(7):519-20. PubMed ID: 9032145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Final mammography recommendation?
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1997 Apr; 277(15):1181. PubMed ID: 9103327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening mammography for women in their forties: the Panel of Babel.
    Healy BP
    J Womens Health; 1997 Feb; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9065366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49--a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making.
    Ernster VL
    Am J Public Health; 1997 Jul; 87(7):1103-6. PubMed ID: 9240097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation is not causation.
    Rimer BK
    Am J Public Health; 1998 May; 88(5):832-3; discussion 834-5. PubMed ID: 9585761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preserving scientific debate and patient choice: lessons from the Consensus Panel on Mammography Screening. National Institutes of Health.
    Woolf SH; Lawrence RS
    JAMA; 1997 Dec; 278(23):2105-8. PubMed ID: 9403427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
    Fletcher SW
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Apr; 336(16):1180-3. PubMed ID: 9099666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 9885578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mammography muddle.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1151. PubMed ID: 9129402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
    Patti J; Lee C
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
    Berlin L; Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
    Baines CJ
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):298; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 20851950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer.
    Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(23):3136-42. PubMed ID: 12069679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mammogram war.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 1997 Feb; 129(8):54-8. PubMed ID: 10164990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
    Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NCI reverses one expert panel, sides with another.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5309):27-8. PubMed ID: 9122702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Report of the NMA panel on mammography.
    Morgan RC
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 Jul; 89(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 9220692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):294-5; author reply 295. PubMed ID: 20851947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The controversy of mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.