126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9032145)
1. NIH consensus panel spurs discontent.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(7):519-20. PubMed ID: 9032145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Final mammography recommendation?
Marwick C
JAMA; 1997 Apr; 277(15):1181. PubMed ID: 9103327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography for women in their forties: the Panel of Babel.
Healy BP
J Womens Health; 1997 Feb; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9065366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49--a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making.
Ernster VL
Am J Public Health; 1997 Jul; 87(7):1103-6. PubMed ID: 9240097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation is not causation.
Rimer BK
Am J Public Health; 1998 May; 88(5):832-3; discussion 834-5. PubMed ID: 9585761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preserving scientific debate and patient choice: lessons from the Consensus Panel on Mammography Screening. National Institutes of Health.
Woolf SH; Lawrence RS
JAMA; 1997 Dec; 278(23):2105-8. PubMed ID: 9403427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1997 Apr; 336(16):1180-3. PubMed ID: 9099666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 9885578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The mammography muddle.
Rogers LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1151. PubMed ID: 9129402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
Berlin L; Hall FM
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer.
Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(23):3136-42. PubMed ID: 12069679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The mammogram war.
Begley S
Newsweek; 1997 Feb; 129(8):54-8. PubMed ID: 10164990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NCI reverses one expert panel, sides with another.
Taubes G
Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5309):27-8. PubMed ID: 9122702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Report of the NMA panel on mammography.
Morgan RC
J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 Jul; 89(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 9220692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):294-5; author reply 295. PubMed ID: 20851947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The controversy of mammography screening.
Kopans DB
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer screening policy.
Cox B
N Z Med J; 1998 Nov; 111(1078):459. PubMed ID: 9891567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NCI board votes to keep mammography guidelines.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2783. PubMed ID: 8133600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
