BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9034728)

  • 21. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
    Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrepant HPV/cytology cotesting results: Are there differences between cytology-negative versus HPV-negative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Tracht JM; Davis AD; Fasciano DN; Eltoum IA
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Oct; 125(10):795-805. PubMed ID: 28817235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Safaeian M; Solomon D; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Castle P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17540804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: follow-up study of an Asian screening population.
    Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Ng KM; Fong KW; Yeung AC; Tsun OK; Khoo US; Chan KY; Ng AW
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 15098250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.
    Davey DD; Woodhouse S; Styer P; Stastny J; Mody D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 10656727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and the clinical significance of p16(INK4a) protein as a marker of progression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I].
    Wang R; Li X; Qian M; Niu J; You Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 26268412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
    Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.
    Jeng CJ; Liang HS; Wang TY; Shen J; Yang YC; Tzeng CR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 12911731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears.
    Recio FO; Sahai Srivastava BI; Wong C; Hempling RE; Eltabbakh GH; Piver MS
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9641214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
    Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of cytologic screening results of the cervix.
    Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Bilgiç R; Cakar Y; Eren S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 15823114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
    Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Atypical reparative change on cervical/vaginal smears may be associated with dysplasia.
    Rimm DL; Gmitro S; Frable WJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 8725141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of human papillomavirus type 16/18 genotyping in predicting high-grade cervical/vaginal intraepithelial neoplasm in women with mildly abnormal Papanicolaou results.
    Guo M; Gong Y; Wang J; Dawlett M; Patel S; Liu P; Bevers TB; Sneige N
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Feb; 121(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23225501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Bethesda classification and association with Human Papillomavirus.
    Barcelos AC; Michelin MA; Adad SJ; Murta EF
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 2011():904674. PubMed ID: 21760701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
    Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
    Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
    Yang M; Zachariah S
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.