These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9035278)

  • 1. Storage phosphor digital mammography.
    Hogge JP; Freedman MT
    Semin Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 32(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 9035278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider.
    Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 20082161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
    Kitahama H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Capacities of digital mammography in screening].
    Belotserkovtseva LD; Klimova NV; Samatova TB; Agapova NA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2008; (4-6):33-6. PubMed ID: 21337748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 7652013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current status and issues of screening digital mammography in Japan.
    Yamada T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 20143190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.