These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9035919)

  • 1. Transcutaneous electrical resistance: application in predicting skin corrosives.
    Lewis RW; Basketter DA
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():243-55. PubMed ID: 9035919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: "Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals".
    Ulmer WR
    Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(6):475-6; author response 476-8. PubMed ID: 14680995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals.
    Stobbe JL; Drake KD; Maier KJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12745991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of bootstrap resampling to assess the uncertainty of cooper statistics.
    Worth AP; Cronin MT
    Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11506639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Race is on to find alternative to animal tests.
    Goodman S
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):116. PubMed ID: 12110854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial microorgans: a microfluidic tool for in vitro assessment of toxicity.
    Schütte J; Stelzle M
    Bioanalysis; 2011 Nov; 3(21):2373-5. PubMed ID: 22074276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dermal toxicity: alternative methods for risk assessment.
    Goldberg AM; Maibach HI
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):493-6. PubMed ID: 9599697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ECVAM's activities in validating alternative tests for skin corrosion and irritation.
    Fentem JH; Botham PA
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():61-7. PubMed ID: 12572585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irritant reactions on hairless micropig skin: a model for testing barrier creams?
    Gabard B; Treffel P; Charton-Picard F; Eloy R
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():275-87. PubMed ID: 9035922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants.
    Nicander I; Ollmar S; Eek A; Lundh Rozell B; Emtestam L
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8746333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEC/COLIPA in vitro photoirritancy program: results of the first stage of validation.
    Spielmann H; Liebsch M; Pape WJ; Balls M; Dupuis J; Klecak G; Lovell WW; Maurer T; De Silva O; Steiling W
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():256-64. PubMed ID: 9035920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.
    Agner T; Serup J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 May; 20(5):352-9. PubMed ID: 2670419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three dimensional in vitro human tissue models for ADME-Tox studies.
    Chun YJ
    Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2014; 29(6):431-432. PubMed ID: 25742743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Read-across to rank skin sensitization potential: subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain.
    Schultz TW; Rogers K; Aptula AO
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19125718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-centre evaluation of the human organotypic skin explant culture model for screening contact allergens.
    Lehé CL; Jacobs JJ; Elliott GR; Das PK
    Altern Lab Anim; 2003 Dec; 31(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 15560745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye irritation.
    Eskes C; Bessou S; Bruner L; Curren R; Harbell J; Jones P; Kreiling R; Liebsch M; McNamee P; Pape W; Prinsen MK; Seidle T; Vanparys P; Worth A; Zuang V
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():47-81. PubMed ID: 16194141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective and reproducible assessment of irritants in vivo. A reappraisal of the IT50 in honour of Kligman and Wooding.
    Bahmer FA; Feldmann U
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():288-95. PubMed ID: 9035924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review on skin and mucous-membrane irritation tests and their application.
    Bosshard E
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 3891553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures.
    Jacobs JJ; Lehé C; Cammans KD; Das PK; Elliott GR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Oct; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 12206825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.