BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9035922)

  • 1. Irritant reactions on hairless micropig skin: a model for testing barrier creams?
    Gabard B; Treffel P; Charton-Picard F; Eloy R
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():275-87. PubMed ID: 9035922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of barrier creams.
    Grunewald AM; Gloor M; Gehring W; Kleesz P
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():187-97. PubMed ID: 9035914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular "skin protector" against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig.
    Frosch PJ; Schulze-Dirks A; Hoffmann M; Axthelm I
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Aug; 29(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 8365180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human barrier formation and reaction to irritation.
    Fartasch M
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():95-103. PubMed ID: 9035933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of a new class of perfluoropolyethers in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis.
    Schliemann-Willers S; Wigger-Alberti W; Elsner P
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2001; 81(6):392-4. PubMed ID: 11859938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
    Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (I). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in the guinea pig.
    Frosch PJ; Schulze-Dirks A; Hoffmann M; Axthelm I; Kurte A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 7980724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Horny layer thickness as assessed functionally does not predict sodium lauryl sulphate skin irritation.
    Zarafonitis G; van der Valk PG
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():176-9. PubMed ID: 9035911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
    Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of protective creams in a modified repeated irritation test. Methodological aspects.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Rougier A; Richard A; Elsner P
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Jul; 78(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 9689294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser Doppler image scanning for assessment of skin irritation.
    Fullerton A; Serup J
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 23():159-68. PubMed ID: 9035909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants.
    Frosch PJ; Kurte A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 7821009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Focusing on a test to evaluate the efficacy of skin barrier creams].
    Zissu D; Falcy M
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1994; 121(10):700-3. PubMed ID: 7793758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of 4 commercially available protective creams in the repetitive irritation test (RIT).
    Schlüter-Wigger W; Elsner P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Apr; 34(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 8730167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimentally induced chronic irritant contact dermatitis to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams in vivo.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Caduff L; Burg G; Elsner P
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Apr; 40(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 10188679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation.
    Schnetz E; Diepgen TL; Elsner P; Frosch PJ; Klotz AJ; Kresken J; Kuss O; Merk H; Schwanitz HJ; Wigger-Alberti W; Fartasch M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):336-43. PubMed ID: 10871097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tandem repeated irritation in aged skin induces distinct barrier perturbation and cytokine profile in vivo.
    Angelova-Fischer I; Becker V; Fischer TW; Zillikens D; Wigger-Alberti W; Kezic S
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 22578221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skin irritant reactivity following experimental cumulative irritant contact dermatitis.
    Widmer J; Elsner P; Burg G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Jan; 30(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8156760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irritant reactivity in males and females.
    Lammintausta K; Maibach HI; Wilson D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Nov; 17(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 2963725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protection afforded by controlled application of a barrier cream: a study in a workplace setting.
    Sadhra SS; Kurmi OP; Mohammed NI; Foulds IS
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Oct; 171(4):813-8. PubMed ID: 24814652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.