These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9037659)

  • 1. The expression "proof" is often misused by reviewers and authors.
    Versprille A
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Jan; 23(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 9037659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Flanagin A
    Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tips for manuscript reviewers.
    Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay].
    Kelly KB
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 14-20; 102(11):888. PubMed ID: 15835532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editing the JPH.
    Vetter N
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Sep; 29(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 17715152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
    Taylor D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewing manuscripts: developing an efficient system.
    Brooks-Brunn JA
    Nurse Author Ed; 1993; 3(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 8220621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
    Dowd SB; McElveny C
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plagiarism: an unprofessional and dishonest trend creeping into modern writing of research and review papers.
    Stephens MM
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 15(2):57. PubMed ID: 19410168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Submitting manuscripts to biomedical journals: common errors and helpful solutions.
    Johnson C; Green B
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19121460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [From a manuscript to an article in Tidsskriftet].
    Ringnes A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 16397648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to get your paper rejected.
    Chernick V
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 18203183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
    Schachat AP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Aug; 141(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 2752346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
    Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.
    Valente S
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.