352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9038130)
1. Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging.
Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Daldrup HE; Hesse T; Balzer T; Tombach B; Peters PE
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 9038130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence.
Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Shamsi K; Balzer T; Daldrup HE; Tombach B; Hesse T; Berns T; Peters PE
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 8633143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The dynamic magnetic resonance study of focal liver lesions by FLASH sequences with bolus intravenous gadolinium-DTPA].
Olivetti L; Grazioli L; Maroldi R; Matricardi L; Milanesio L
Radiol Med; 1992 Apr; 83(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1318558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography.
Tateyama A; Fukukura Y; Takumi K; Shindo T; Kumagae Y; Kamimura K; Nakajo M
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Nov; 18(43):6269-76. PubMed ID: 23180948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Stern W; Schick F; Kopp AF; Reimer P; Shamsi K; Claussen CD; Laniado M
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10866081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: findings in 311 lesions.
Quillin SP; Atilla S; Brown JJ; Borrello JA; Yu CY; Pilgram TK
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 9201674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions. Comparison of the superparamagnetic iron oxide resovist versus gadolinium-DTPA in the same patient.
Vogl TJ; Hammerstingl R; Schwarz W; Kümmel S; Müller PK; Balzer T; Lauten MJ; Balzer JO; Mack MG; Schimpfky C; Schrem H; Bechstein WO; Neuhaus P; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 1996 Nov; 31(11):696-708. PubMed ID: 8915751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic sequential MR imaging of focal liver lesions: initial experience in 22 patients at 1.5 T.
Schmiedl U; Kölbel G; Hess CF; Klose U; Kurtz B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 2164538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium.
Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of a multicenter trial.
Zech CJ; Grazioli L; Breuer J; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jul; 43(7):504-11. PubMed ID: 18580333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions: a Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.
Ichikawa T; Saito K; Yoshioka N; Tanimoto A; Gokan T; Takehara Y; Kamura T; Gabata T; Murakami T; Ito K; Hirohashi S; Nishie A; Saito Y; Onaya H; Kuwatsuru R; Morimoto A; Ueda K; Kurauchi M; Breuer J
Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 20098330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Hamm B; Fischer E; Taupitz M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 2312848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Runge VM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(4):643-50. PubMed ID: 9676461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging.
Hamm B; Staks T; Mühler A; Bollow M; Taupitz M; Frenzel T; Wolf KJ; Weinmann HJ; Lange L
Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 7754011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Zech CJ; Herrmann KA; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17510541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for use in MR cholangiography: results of an in vivo phase-I clinical evaluation.
Bollow M; Taupitz M; Hamm B; Staks T; Wolf KJ; Weinmann HJ
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 9000414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional hepatobiliary imaging with gadolinium-EOB-DTPA. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 153gadolinium-EOB-DTPA scintigraphy in rats.
Schmitz SA; Mühler A; Wagner S; Wolf KJ
Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 8675423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liver. III: Gadolinium-based hepatobiliary contrast agents (Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg).
Giovagnoni A; Paci E
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1996 Feb; 4(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 8673717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
