These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9038409)

  • 1. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects.
    Sekiyama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.
    Magnotti JF; Basu Mallick D; Feng G; Zhou B; Zhou W; Beauchamp MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2581-6. PubMed ID: 26041554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Cross-Language and Stimulus-Dependent Effects on the McGurk Effect with Finnish and Japanese Speakers and Listeners.
    Tiippana K; Ujiie Y; Peromaa T; Takahashi K
    Brain Sci; 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37626554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders.
    Dodd B; McIntosh B; Erdener D; Burnham D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jan; 22(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 18092221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
    Brown VA; Hedayati M; Zanger A; Mayn S; Ray L; Dillman-Hasso N; Strand JF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207160. PubMed ID: 30418995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: an fMRI study of the McGurk effect.
    Jones JA; Callan DE
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jun; 14(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 12821795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.
    Walker S; Bruce V; O'Malley C
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1124-33. PubMed ID: 8539088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual speech perception in children with developmental language disorder in degraded listening conditions.
    Meronen A; Tiippana K; Westerholm J; Ahonen T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 22653918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect.
    Burnham D; Dodd B
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Dec; 45(4):204-20. PubMed ID: 15549685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental factors and the non-native speaker effect in auditory-visual speech perception.
    Chen Y; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):858-65. PubMed ID: 19640050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The McGurk phenomenon in Italian listeners.
    Bovo R; Ciorba A; Prosser S; Martini A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2009 Aug; 29(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 20161878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The noisy encoding of disparity model predicts perception of the McGurk effect in native Japanese speakers.
    Magnotti JF; Lado A; Beauchamp MS
    Front Neurosci; 2024; 18():1421713. PubMed ID: 38988770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.