219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9038606)
1. The cost-effectiveness of navelbine alone or in combination with cisplatin in comparison to other chemotherapy regimens and best supportive care in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Evans WK; Le Chevalier T
Eur J Cancer; 1996 Dec; 32A(13):2249-55. PubMed ID: 9038606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of vinorelbine alone or vinorelbine plus cisplatin for stage IV NSCLC.
Evans WK
Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Mar; 12(3 Suppl 4):18-25; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 9556779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of three regimens using vinorelbine (Navelbine) for non-small cell lung cancer.
Hillner BE; Smith TJ
Semin Oncol; 1996 Apr; 23(2 Suppl 5):25-30. PubMed ID: 8610234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision framework for chemotherapeutic interventions for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
Berthelot JM; Will BP; Evans WK; Coyle D; Earle CC; Bordeleau L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Aug; 92(16):1321-9. PubMed ID: 10944554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Sidhu M; Hewitson P; Waugh N
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(32):1-195. PubMed ID: 12065068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A pharmacoeconomic review.
Coukell AJ; Noble S; Faulds D
Pharmacoeconomics; 1999 Apr; 15(4):405-17. PubMed ID: 10537959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and vindesine plus cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Smith TJ; Hillner BE; Neighbors DM; McSorley PA; Le Chevalier T
J Clin Oncol; 1995 Sep; 13(9):2166-73. PubMed ID: 7666075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Results of a randomized study comparing combination of navelbine-cisplatin to combination of vindesine-cisplatin and to navelbine alone in 612 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer].
Le Chevalier T; Brisgand D; Pujol JL; Douillard JY; Monnier A; Rivière A; Chomy P; Le Groumellec A; Ruffie P; Gottfried M; Gaspard MH; Chevreau C; Alberola V; Cigolari S; Besson F; Martinez A; Besenval M; Berthaud P; Tursz T
Bull Cancer; 1996 May; 83(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 8680091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients.
Le Chevalier T; Brisgand D; Douillard JY; Pujol JL; Alberola V; Monnier A; Riviere A; Lianes P; Chomy P; Cigolari S
J Clin Oncol; 1994 Feb; 12(2):360-7. PubMed ID: 8113844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overview of economic analysis of Le Chevalier Vinorelbine Study.
Hillner BE; Smith TJ
Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Mar; 12(3 Suppl 4):14-6; discussion 17. PubMed ID: 9556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectivenes of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Earle CC; Evans WK
Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(5-6):815-20. PubMed ID: 10360660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer.
Plosker GL; Hurst M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1111-34. PubMed ID: 11735678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Hewitson P; Sidhu M; Waugh N
Thorax; 2002 Jan; 57(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 11809985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cost-effectiveness analysis: a reader's guide].
Vergnenègre A
Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Feb; 20(1 Pt 1):116-25. PubMed ID: 12709640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do all patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer benefit from cisplatin-based combination therapy?
Soria JC; Brisgand D; Le Chevalier T
Ann Oncol; 2001 Dec; 12(12):1667-70. PubMed ID: 11843242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of hospital treatment--two chemotherapic regimens for non-surgical non-small cell lung cancer. GFPC (Groupe Français Pneumo Cancérologie).
Vergnenègre A; Perol M; Pham E
Lung Cancer; 1996 Feb; 14(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 8696719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A three-arm trial of vinorelbine (Navelbine) plus cisplatin, vindesine plus cisplatin, and single-agent vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: an expanded analysis.
Le Chevalier T; Pujol JL; Douillard JY; Alberola V; Monnier A; Riviere A; Lianes P; Chomy P; Cigolari S; Besson F
Semin Oncol; 1994 Oct; 21(5 Suppl 10):28-33; discussion 33-4. PubMed ID: 7973766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long term analysis of survival in the European randomized trial comparing vinorelbine/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin and vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Le Chevalier T; Brisgand D; Soria JC; Douillard JY; Pujol JL; Ruffie P; Aberola V; Cigolari S
Oncologist; 2001; 6 Suppl 1():8-11. PubMed ID: 11181998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of continuation maintenance pemetrexed after cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: estimates from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.
Zeng X; Peng L; Li J; Chen G; Tan C; Wang S; Wan X; Ouyang L; Zhao Z
Clin Ther; 2013 Jan; 35(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 23328269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cost-effectiveness of weekly paclitaxel for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer].
Suyama H; Hitsuda Y; Matsumoto S; Nakamoto M; Shigeoka Y; Nakanishi H; Igishi T; Burioka N; Yasuda K; Sako T; Miyata M; Endo M; Shimizu E
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2003 Mar; 30(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 12669395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
