BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9039601)

  • 1. Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA and superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in the detection of primary liver cancer: a comparative study by alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Tanimoto A; Satoh Y; Yuasa Y; Jinzaki M; Hiramatsu K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 9039601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA in MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice: a comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto R; Fritz-Zieroth B; Yamanaka T; Takahashi M; Miyazawa T; Tatsuta M; Terada N; Hosomi N; Inoue E; Kuroda C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 8724413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of liver tumors.
    Clemént O; Mühler A; Vexler VS; Kuwatsuru R; Berthezène Y; Rosenau W; Brasch RC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 8428104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
    Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R
    Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence.
    Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Shamsi K; Balzer T; Daldrup HE; Tombach B; Hesse T; Berns T; Peters PE
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 8633143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prolonged positive contrast enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA in experimental liver tumors: potential value in tissue characterization.
    Ni Y; Marchal G; Yu J; Mühler A; Lukito G; Baert AL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 8061434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging: quantitative and qualitative comparison of hepatocyte-phase images obtained 10 min and 20 min after injection for the detection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.
    Sofue K; Tsurusaki M; Tokue H; Arai Y; Sugimura K
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Nov; 21(11):2336-43. PubMed ID: 21748389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinomas in rats: comparison with Tc-99m-IDA uptake.
    Van Beers BE; Grandin C; Pauwels S; Mottet I; Goudemant JF; Delos M; Demeure R; Pringot J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 8061433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of Bifunctional Gadolinium-Labeled Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles (Gd-MnMEIO) for In Vivo MR Imaging of the Liver in an Animal Model.
    Kuo YT; Chen CY; Liu GC; Wang YM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148695. PubMed ID: 26886558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between Gd-DTPA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Mn-DPDP in induced HCC in rats: a correlation study of MR imaging, microangiography, and histology.
    Marchal G; Zhang X; Ni Y; Van Hecke P; Yu J; Baert AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 11(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 8345781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental hepatic dysfunction: evaluation by MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA.
    Kim T; Murakami T; Hasuike Y; Gotoh M; Kato N; Takahashi M; Miyazawa T; Narumi Y; Monden M; Nakamura H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(4):683-8. PubMed ID: 9243389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in characterizing cirrhotic nodules with atypical enhancement on Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images.
    Wang YC; Chou CT; Lin CP; Chen YL; Chen YF; Chen RC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174594. PubMed ID: 28355258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapy response assessment after radioembolization of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma--comparison of MR imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid and gadobutrol.
    Schelhorn J; Best J; Reinboldt MP; Gerken G; Ruhlmann M; Lauenstein TC; Antoch G; Kinner S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):972-9. PubMed ID: 25937296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging.
    Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Daldrup HE; Hesse T; Balzer T; Tombach B; Peters PE
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 9038130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional hepatobiliary imaging with gadolinium-EOB-DTPA. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 153gadolinium-EOB-DTPA scintigraphy in rats.
    Schmitz SA; Mühler A; Wagner S; Wolf KJ
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 8675423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases.
    Shimada K; Isoda H; Hirokawa Y; Arizono S; Shibata T; Togashi K
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Nov; 20(11):2690-8. PubMed ID: 20563726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium.
    Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unenhanced fat fraction ratios obtained by MR and enhanced T2* values with liver-specific MR contrast agents for diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in rats.
    Okada M; Katsube T; Kumano S; Kagawa Y; Araki T; Tsuda N; Okuaki T; Imaoka I; Tanigawa N; Ishii K; Murakami T
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 21498305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences.
    Blakeborough A; Ward J; Wilson D; Griffiths M; Kajiya Y; Guthrie JA; Robinson PJ
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):759-65. PubMed ID: 9169701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions: a Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.
    Ichikawa T; Saito K; Yoshioka N; Tanimoto A; Gokan T; Takehara Y; Kamura T; Gabata T; Murakami T; Ito K; Hirohashi S; Nishie A; Saito Y; Onaya H; Kuwatsuru R; Morimoto A; Ueda K; Kurauchi M; Breuer J
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 20098330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.