These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9039902)

  • 1. Beyond the language barrier.
    Umakantha N
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):764. PubMed ID: 9039902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.
    Habibzadeh F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jun; 83(6):404. PubMed ID: 15976887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidentiality.
    Guenin LM
    Science; 1996 Mar; 271(5257):1790. PubMed ID: 8596940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the language barrier.
    Carter-Sigglow J
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):764. PubMed ID: 9039903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paranoid about peer review?
    Rumjanek FD
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6609):509. PubMed ID: 8955262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors.
    Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
    Svetlov V
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.