These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9040305)
1. Methodological studies of systematic reviews: is there publication bias? Laupacis A Arch Intern Med; 1997 Feb; 157(3):357-8. PubMed ID: 9040305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Khan KS; Daya S; Jadad A Arch Intern Med; 1996 Mar; 156(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 8629879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pharmacologic treatment of idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Francavilla S; Gabriele A; Oliveri M; Cordeschi G; Properzi G Acta Eur Fertil; 1993; 24(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 7985471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revisiting oestrogen antagonists (clomiphene or tamoxifen) as medical empiric therapy for idiopathic male infertility: a meta-analysis. Chua ME; Escusa KG; Luna S; Tapia LC; Dofitas B; Morales M Andrology; 2013 Sep; 1(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 23970453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Current trends in the clinical use of non-steroidal antiestrogens]. Gus AI Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1984 Aug; (8):9-13. PubMed ID: 6385751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews. Saini P; Loke YK; Gamble C; Altman DG; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6501. PubMed ID: 25416499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF JAMA; 2003 Jul; 290(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 12876092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis. Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ovarian ablation as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Pritchard KI Cancer Treat Res; 1998; 94():158-80. PubMed ID: 9587687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishing negative results: the problem of publication bias. Rockwell S; Kimler BF; Moulder JE Radiat Res; 2006 Jun; 165(6):623-5. PubMed ID: 16802861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Publishing journal's prestige does not influence critical appraisal. Garfinkle M; Stewart S; Ward H; Wilson T J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1093-4. PubMed ID: 25293423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses. Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Otwombe KN; Ogutu B East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The quest for unbiased research: randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines. Schulz KF Ann Neurol; 1997 May; 41(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 9153517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study. Dechartres A; Trinquart L; Atal I; Moher D; Dickersin K; Boutron I; Perrodeau E; Altman DG; Ravaud P BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2490. PubMed ID: 28596181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]