These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9040469)

  • 1. Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing.
    Zackon DH; Casson EJ; Stelmach L; Faubert J; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 9040469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective attention increases the dependency of cortical responses on visual motion coherence in man.
    Händel B; Lutzenberger W; Thier P; Haarmeier T
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Dec; 18(12):2902-8. PubMed ID: 18424779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual field asymmetries in selective attention: evidence from a modified search paradigm.
    Michael GA; Ojéda N
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 16026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A monocular, unconscious form of visual attention.
    Self MW; Roelfsema PR
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):17.1-23. PubMed ID: 20465336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric modulation of cortical activation during smooth pursuit with and without target blanking. an fMRI study.
    Nagel M; Sprenger A; Zapf S; Erdmann C; Kömpf D; Heide W; Binkofski F; Lencer R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1319-25. PubMed ID: 16216531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual field defects for vergence eye movements and for stereomotion perception.
    Regan D; Erkelens CJ; Collewijn H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 May; 27(5):806-19. PubMed ID: 3700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retinotopy and attention in human occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex.
    Saygin AP; Sereno MI
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Sep; 18(9):2158-68. PubMed ID: 18234687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human visual development over the first 6 months of life. A review and a hypothesis.
    Atkinson J
    Hum Neurobiol; 1984; 3(2):61-74. PubMed ID: 6378843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of binocular and monocular distractors on saccades in participants with normal binocular vision.
    Griffiths H; Whittle J; Buckley D
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):72-81. PubMed ID: 16246393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Connectivity and signal intensity in the parieto-occipital cortex predicts top-down attentional effect in visual masking: an fMRI study based on individual differences.
    Tsubomi H; Ikeda T; Hanakawa T; Hirose N; Fukuyama H; Osaka N
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):587-97. PubMed ID: 19103296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binocular influences on global motion processing in the human visual system.
    Hess RF; Hutchinson CV; Ledgeway T; Mansouri B
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1682-92. PubMed ID: 17442362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain.
    Moutoussis K; Keliris G; Kourtzi Z; Logothetis N
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2231-43. PubMed ID: 15924938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The temporal order judgment paradigm: subcortical attentional contribution under exogenous and endogenous cueing conditions.
    Zackon DH; Casson EJ; Zafar A; Stelmach L; Racette L
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 May; 37(5):511-20. PubMed ID: 10340311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements.
    Kustov AA; Robinson DL
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6604):74-7. PubMed ID: 8900281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames.
    Wilson KD; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):668-83. PubMed ID: 15808968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human MT/V5 activity on viewing eye gaze changes in others: A magnetoencephalographic study.
    Watanabe S; Kakigi R; Miki K; Puce A
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 16684514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion.
    Sterzer P; Russ MO; Preibisch C; Kleinschmidt A
    Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):908-16. PubMed ID: 11906231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.