154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9040995)
1. A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: quality and cost analysis.
Cohen J; Haber GB; Kortan P; Dorais JA; Scheider DM; Cirocco M; Habib J
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9040995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, cost-effectiveness, and safety of reuse of ancillary devices for ERCP.
Prat F; Spieler JF; Paci S; Pallier C; Fritsch J; Choury AD; Pelletier G; Raspaud S; Nordmann P; Buffet C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Aug; 60(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 15278053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Lee RM; Vida F; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Gluck M; Tomas A; Sumida SE; Irizarry D; Jane C
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of costs of disposable accessories in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.
Kim-Deobald J; Kozarek RA; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Raltz S
Gastrointest Endosc; 1993; 39(6):763-5. PubMed ID: 8293897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jan; 49(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 9869721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories.
Ogoshi K
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G82-5. PubMed ID: 11100999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical and economic feasibility of reusing disposable perfusion cannulae.
Bloom DF; Cornhill JF; Malchesky PS; Richardson DM; Bolsen KA; Haire DM; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(3):248-9. PubMed ID: 9181243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Demoulin L; Kesteloot K; Penninckx F
Surg Endosc; 1996 May; 10(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 8658331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical and economic feasibility of reusing disposable perfusion cannulas.
Bloom DF; Cornhill JF; Malchesky PS; Richardson DM; Bolsen KA; Haire DM; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 114(3):448-60. PubMed ID: 9305199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Therapeutic ERCP: a cost-prohibitive procedure?
Walker RS; Vanagunas AD; Williams P; Chodash HB
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Aug; 46(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 9283864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
Muscarella LF
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
Petersen BT
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
