These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9041107)

  • 1. Subpoenas and science--when lawyers force their way into the laboratory.
    Black B
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Mar; 336(10):725-7. PubMed ID: 9041107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subpoenas and science.
    Gorelick DA
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Jul; 337(4):282-3. PubMed ID: 9229701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accountability in science and government: is access the answer?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 10862368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of the new federal medical-privacy rule on research.
    Kulynych J; Korn D
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11796857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State funding and data disclosure.
    Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9158):1027. PubMed ID: 10199342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New duties for the sentinels.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(5):2. PubMed ID: 8002302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Privacy bill under fire from researchers.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):6. PubMed ID: 9510231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 11796863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Privacy rules set no new research curbs.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Sep; 277(5333):1757. PubMed ID: 9324761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The threat to medical-records research.
    Melton LJ
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1466-70. PubMed ID: 9380105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process.
    Parrish DM; Bruns DE
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2839-41. PubMed ID: 12038928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US to tighten protection of medical data.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6643):611. PubMed ID: 9262386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data disclosure and data sharing in scientific research.
    Allison JR; Cooper WW
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):93-132. PubMed ID: 16144091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review.
    Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E
    IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [American judge preserves confidentiality in the peer review process].
    Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jul; 152(28):1555-6. PubMed ID: 18712221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidentiality as an organizational ethics issue.
    Hall R
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 10693048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health and the right to privacy.
    Starr P
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(2-3):193-201. PubMed ID: 10476328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Institutional review boards, genetic research, and privacy.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):6. PubMed ID: 11660229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.