These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9042440)

  • 1. Central auditory processing of speech in cochlear implant users demonstrated by positron emission tomography.
    Naito Y; Hirano S; Okazawa H; Takahashi H; Ishizu K; Fujiki N; Shiomi Y; Kawano M; Yonekura Y; Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():19-23. PubMed ID: 9042440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical activity and speech perception performance in cochlear implant users.
    Fujiki N; Naito Y; Hirano S; Kojima H; Shiomi Y; Nishizawa S; Konishi J; Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():32-5. PubMed ID: 11892178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound-induced activation of auditory cortices in cochlear implant users with post- and prelingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography.
    Naito Y; Hirano S; Honjo I; Okazawa H; Ishizu K; Takahashi H; Fujiki N; Shiomi Y; Yonekura Y; Konishi J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Jul; 117(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 9288201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between rCBF and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Fujiki N; Naito Y; Hirano S; Kojima H; Shiomi Y; Nishizawa S; Konishi J; Honjo I
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Jul; 26(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10419029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical activation during sound stimulation in cochlear implant users demonstrated by positron emission tomography.
    Naito Y; Okazawa H; Honjo I; Takahashi H; Kawano M; Ishizu K; Yonekura Y
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():60-4. PubMed ID: 7668759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positron emission tomography in cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients.
    Miyamoto RT; Wong D
    J Commun Disord; 2001; 34(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 11725859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain function of cochlear implant users.
    Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():42-4. PubMed ID: 11892206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of monosyllabic words by cochlear implant patients and by normal-hearing subjects listening to words processed through cochlear implant signal processing strategies.
    Dorman MF; Loizou PC; Fitzke J; Tu Z
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():64-6. PubMed ID: 11141009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and plasticity of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users: a follow-up study by positron emission tomography.
    Naito Y; Hirano S; Fujiki N; Nishizawa S; Takahashi H; Kojima H; Yamaguchi S; Kawano M; Konishi J; Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():55-9. PubMed ID: 11892215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. fMRI as a Preimplant Objective Tool to Predict Postimplant Oral Language Outcomes in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Deshpande AK; Tan L; Lu LJ; Altaye M; Holland SK
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e263-72. PubMed ID: 26689275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients.
    Giraud AL; Truy E; Frackowiak RS; Grégoire MC; Pujol JF; Collet L
    Brain; 2000 Jul; 123 ( Pt 7)():1391-402. PubMed ID: 10869051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Correlation of auditory-verbal skills in patients with cochlear implants and their evaluation in positone emission tomography (PET)].
    Łukaszewicz Z; Soluch P; Niemczyk K; Lachowska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2010 Jun; 64(7):10-6. PubMed ID: 21171304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observation of cortical activity during speech stimulation in prelingually deafened adults with cochlear implantation by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
    Yoshida H; Kanda Y; Takahashi H; Miyamoto I; Chiba K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2011 Aug; 120(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 21922972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P
    Audiology; 1997; 36(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 9099406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Desai S; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):428-40. PubMed ID: 18177171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implants patients and normal-hearing subjects.
    Giraud AL; Truy E
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1562-9. PubMed ID: 11985837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandarin Lexical Tone Acquisition in Cochlear Implant Users With Prelingual Deafness: A Review.
    Tan J; Dowell R; Vogel A
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 25(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 27387047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.